Search results

Seeing no other witnesses, the Court will proceeding to invite parties to present Closing Statements. @Dogeington The Commonwealth has until Jan 10th, 2025 at 9pm EST. @ko531 You'll have three days after CW's submission to present your Closing Statement.

@ko531 Prosecution rests on direction examination of witnesses. Please proceed in cross-examination of ElysiaCrynn.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - Volt Bank, Inc. v. Sagamo2008 [2025] FCR 135 Summary of Controversy Plaintiff, a registered bank, issued a loan to Defendant in the total amount of $180,000. On reading of the loan agreements, parties have agreed to interest charges...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - in re: Assets of Sagamo2008 On issuance of a verdict in [2025] FCR 135, the Court does modify its injunction for assets originally owned by Sagamo2008. 1) The Court releases plot S079 from all injunctions. No other plot owned by...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - in re: Assets of Sagamo2008 On issuance of a verdict in [2025] FCR 135, the Court does modify its injunction for assets originally owned by Sagamo2008. 1) The Court releases plot S079 from all injunctions. No other plot owned by...

Certainly, I'll give you 72 Hours to find counsel.

@Dogeington You may proceed on direct examination of AsexualDinosaur.

Overruled. AsexualDinosaur is not an employee of the DOC, but that alone doesn't render the questioning irrelevant. This line of questioning is aimed at determining whether those avenues were used before the policy was leaked, which is plainly relevant.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - On Reconsideration for Commonwealth's Motion for Dismissal Movant requests reconsideration from this Court's previous order denying the dismissal order. Movant states Court misapprehended arguments and seeks clarification...

Didn't see P-013. Motion granted. Court will be in recess pending verdict.

Do you have proof that Volt Bank gave the funds to Defendant? If so, please attach it.

I'll rule directly on your question and expand on what I originally meant. The Court used "immunity" too liberally as to cause confusion, apologies.

Denied. The Court empowered you as a Public Defender, you are here because he didn't respond. I'm not delaying this proceeding because he's suddenly appeared.

@EmmDubz @Talion77 In full review of the case, I don't see any witness. Thus, I'm going to skip Opening Statements and move to Closing Statements. @EmmDubz You have until 1/8/26 @ 9pm EST to present your Closing Statement @Talion77 You have until 1/11/26 @ 9pm EST to present your Closing Statement

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93 Summary of Controversy On 11/13/25, an agent of the Department of Homeland Security summarily found Plaintiff guilty of Trespass x5 at multiple plots owned by Vernicia. These...

Nice, feel free to respond to the Motion of Summary Judgement within 27 Hours

Overruled, these aren't interrogatories. Counselor has presented his Witness Questions, please review my rules (Lawsuit: In Session - IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131)

@Talion77 @EmmDubz I'll be your JO. To my knowledge we are on Opening Statements?

Yes. You understand that telling the Court "he made 0 attempt nor indication at transferring assets, a risk of an asset flight is beyond improbable" and then stating "The defense cannot exactly prove some non-events like this one as 100% certain" is problematic for you, right? This Court...

What proof do you have that "he made 0 attempt nor indication at transferring assets"?