Search results

The court hereby warns you for speaking out of turn. Any further unprompted comments will result in a contempt of court charge. The Defence must provide evidence that AlexanderLove was legally qualified to practice in the FCR and was employed by MZ at the time of his postings. The Defence has...

This objection has been overruled. There is no definitive proof of how many clues a murder produces, and the Plaintiff has not shown proof of intent to mislead.

Greetings. I will be taking over as presiding officer for this case.

The Plaintiff now has 48 hours to present questions to the witness. The witnesses have a further 48 hours to answer, after which any follow-up questions may be asked within a further 48 hours, and so on.

@Staff Team is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of MysticPhunky v. Naezaratheus.

The decision to change the presiding officer mid-case was made in the interest of upholding the right to a speedy trial. Given Kai's substantial caseload, the courts determined reassignment would be appropriate.

Greetings. I will be taking over as presiding officer for this case.

The motion for summary judgement is denied, as there are disputed facts. However, the Defence has missed the deadline for their closing statement and has offered no explanation. The court will hereby enter recess pending verdict. Also, greetings. I will be taking over as presiding officer for...

Greetings. I will be taking over as presiding officer for this case. Thank you both for your opening statements. Witness summons are to follow. You may submit a motion to strike with your reasoning if you wish for the statement to be struck.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT May it please the court. GnomeWhisperer was wrongfully imprisoned. The law was clear—his sentence should have been 60 minutes, yet he was given three days and eight hours. Even though the Defense claims he only served three...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO NULLE PROSEQUI The Prosecution would like to drop all charges. This case was brought forth at the direction of a former employee, and the Department of Justice no longer agrees with the intention behind the case. I would like to...

My apologies, your honour. I had mistakenly entered this into my calendar as a 72 hour deadline, not a 48 hour deadline. The Defence was granted over a week to question their witness. In the interest of fairness, I request a late extension. I am prepared to present my questions to the witness...

Your honour, this more than double the time allotted for discovery. The Plaintiff could have acquired this information prior to filing their lawsuit.

Your Honour, to clarify, have you changed your mind about your statement regarding the evidence made here? Is the proof submitted by Dartanboy now admissible?

The Defence submits the following into evidence:

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honour, I have recently been informed by a reputable source that you wish for me to carry out my sentence before you post the verdict to the forums. If this is true, I urge you to reconsider for the following...

I respectfully request to amend the Answer to Complaint as follows: I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ... 7. The Defence DENIES AFFIRMS that on 15/02, Raitheguy07 opened a ticket with DHS hoping to revert his criminal record for these murders. The Plaintiff has submitted no proof of this occurring, and...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion to Reconsider Your honour, According to Rule 4.2, Submission Required for Use, from the Court Rules and Procedures: All material used in legal arguments must have either been included in the case prior to the submission. Material must...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT RaiTheGuy07 Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defence AFFIRMS that on 12/02, Raitheguy07 received a first offense infraction for murder. 2. The Defence DENIES that Raitheguy07...

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE Your honour, P-001 and P-003 show the Defendant openly speaking about fining the Plaintiff, and the Defence has submitted no evidence to contradict this. There are two pieces of documented evidence of the Defendant not only suggesting, but admitting to the fine. The...