Search results

My apologies your honour, one of my co workers had said the due date was one day closer than it is, the 2-4 hours extension is no longer necessary, my humble apologies

I am asking 2-4 hours please your honour

Hello your honour, I am so sorry to ask again, it’s just I have a lot of major school assignments, would it be possible to get another extension?

Hello your honour, may i please get an extension, ive been swamped with school

Your honour, the evidence is labeled the same because they are evidence for the same fact

Witness Questions Do multiple clues appear in close proximity to each other when a murder produces a crime scene? When a murder produces a crime scene, is it possible to place blocks where the clues appear? In Exhibit P-003, JediAJMan (a.k.a. Homelander) is seen talking about the murder...

Your honor may I have permission to respond to the motion?

your honor, this evidence was apart of Exhibit P-001

Opening Statement IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT May it please the court, Your Honor, opposing counsel, citizens of Redmont, We are here today to make sure the defendant is held liable for all damages they have caused — compensatory damages (loss and...

my apologies your honour, please allow me to label it correctly, like here Lawsuit: Dismissed - UnityMaster v. xEndeavour [2025] FCR 16

sorry, I accidentally posted the first objection thing before I was ready to. Please take a look at the objection which states perjury.

Objection IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY The defences statement “there is no proof of the murder” is subject to perjury as I have submitted viable proof of the murder under evidence exhibit P-002

Case Filing IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION MysticPhunky (represented by Justice Compass Law Firm) Plaintiff v. Naezaratheus Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: MysticPhunky was doing construction on his property...

Your Honour, The first statement was "gaining a maximum of 13 fire reactions" which implies that the number of fire reactions could have been fewer but not more than 13. As for "ganered 13 fire reactions," statement, the original statement of "gaining a maximum of 13 fire reactions" still...

Your honour, may I have permission to reply to the defendants 1st objection?

Your honour, I will be representing Senator Vernicia and we do not want to motion to Nolle Prosequi.