Search results

https://dashboard.tickets.bot/manage/673612908868927498/transcripts/view/22120 https://dashboard.tickets.bot/manage/673612908868927498/transcripts/view/22053

Your Honnur the defence has failed to provide answer to Complaint. May I request the Defendant be ordered to write one so the Plaintiff may respond to any points they make in our opening statement.

Ultrapvpnoob will be representing me in this matter

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE Your Honor, A trial is commonly defined as “a formal examination of evidence by a judge,” which occurs in criminal cases, civil cases, and appellate proceedings alike. The Constitution provides no definition or limitation on what...

Paid to emplyess for exams.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, the sole argument the defence has put forward is that Lex Titanum is not a party to this appeal. However, it has already been established that the fees in question directly impacted Lex Titanum, and consequently...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Dodrio3 Plaintiff v. PurpleBG Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. Dodrio3 - Plaintiff 2. PurpleBG - Defendant II. FACTS 1. On the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO Compel You honour the plaintiff requests that the Department of Public affairs be ordered to produce the report about the mismanagement of the game to this court as well as the reasons for the defendants dismissal from the department...

Permissions to respond.

Correction the DB was formed on may 10th but it's predecessor ReveilleFC was formed a long time before.

We are unaware of a way to check the official formation date. But the plaitiff tells me it was early may.

Which questions your honour?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION Your Honour, The information requested by the defence about membership/employment lists, net worth, foundation rationale, and shareholder/management details. is overly broad and irrelevant to the issues currently before the...

Permissions to respond.

Integritory: In your answer to the complaint, you agree with the statement that a goal does not count if it is caught by the leash before entering the goal, yet in P-004 it is clearly shown that this happens in all the penalties that the Reville Legion goal keeper faced. What was your reason...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE The Defence’s first point claims that the Reville Legion is not a legal entity; they provide no proof of the accusation, and further, P-005 shows the Reville Legion are in fact, a legal entity...

The Plaintiff enters the following evidence P-005

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE The Defence’s second point draws an analogy to Department of Homeland Security cases involving incorrect prison sentences. This comparison is not relevant to the matter at hand, which concerns the alleged mismanagement of...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE The Defence point 3 is not relevant as it refers to policy that happens "IRL" and not within the world or laws/policies that are active within the commonwealth.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION Your Honour, The defence submits that they are not liable for their actions on the basis that they were working on behalf of the Commonwealth. However, the only evidence provided to support this claim is [2025] DCR 49, in...