Search results

Sustained, we grant the extension post-hoc to an additional 24 hours from the original date, as is customary. I apologize, I have been quite pre-occupied with personal matters as of late. Seeing as how the request was made within the original timeframe, we see no reason to refuse it. As the...

This case is dismissed. The court thanks all involved for their time.

The Commonwealth (@Kaiserin_) shall have seventy-two hours to file their closing statement.

Seeing as the Plaintiff has no questions of his own, we will proceed to closing statements. The Plaintiff (@ToadKing) shall have seventy-two hours to present his.

Does the Commonwealth (@Kaiserin_) have any follow-up questions?

Sustained, 2-0. This is irrelevant and not related to any useful argument or contention that we could see. Overruled. In a 1-1-0 decision (one aye, one concurrence, and no nays), the Supreme Court believes this question could provide background to assess the proportionality of the requested...

Associate Justice Smallfries4 writes the unanimous opinion of the court, joined by Chief Justice Aladeen22. Associate Justice Matthew100x did not participate in discussion or voting. Note to the reader: Due to the length of this verdict, pagination has been introduced to assist in future...

In a 2-0 decision, we concur with the Plaintiff in this matter. The time resumes, and the Commonwealth (@Kaiserin_) is to ask questions to the witness within roughly twenty-three hours.

My intuition says this is correct, though court rules are not entirely explicit on the matter. I am not opposed to altering the order as prescribed. I will confer with the bench. I will pause the time for now. Should we reverse the order, the Commonwealth (@Kaiserin_) will have the remainder of...

The Plaintiff (@ToadKing) shall have twenty-four hours to post questions to the witness.

@AmityBlamity is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont.

We grant this extension. The new deadline will be Saturday, November 1st, at 8:46 PM EST.

Just as an update: The verdict for this case is in the process of being written. We hope to publish within a week or so.

The Commonwealth (@Kaiserin_) has seventy-two hours to file their opening statement.

At this time, the Plaintiff (@ToadKing) shall have seventy-two hours to file an opening statement.

"Material" as written within rule 4.2 refers to facts, evidence, and testimony generally. Statutes, the Constitution, rulings by sitting judicial officers, and the law generally exist in the realm of public knowledge and therefore do not need to be affirmatively presented during discovery before...

What relevancy does asking about closing statements have to the context of the trial we are currently in? This seems irrelevant, and an attempt to summon from us a dispositive ruling on an issue that is not before this court.

The parties (@ToadKing & @Kaiserin_) shall have forty-eight hours of discovery.

You shall have forty-eight hours to present your Answer to the Complaint.

@Attorney General's Office is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 18. In a 2-0 vote, Supreme Court will not be granting an emergency injunction. As discussed in the dissenting opinion in zLost v. Commonwealth of Redmont...