Search results

You may do so.

The Attorney General, @gribble19, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Lex Titanum v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 72.

Could you please provide: 1. Proof Lex Titanum has legal standing, viz. proof of registration as a business; and 2. Proof of either a.) ownership or b.) an agreement of representation.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Lex Titanum v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 70 ORDER OF DISMISSAL At the request of the plaintiff, this case is dismissed without prejudice. The plaintiff is instructed to provide proof of qualification when they refile the case.

You may provide the evidence.

The Attorney General, @gribble19, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Lex Titanum v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 70.

To avoid being an advocate for the plaintiffs, this will be the last clarifying question asked. Does Counsel have any evidence demonstrating that Discover Bank was registered as a financial institution with the Department of Commerce?

First, to clarify what is happening procedurally. Defendant is no longer contesting this case. The Court still needs to ensure that Plaintiff meets their burden of proof, so from here on, this case will be a hearing between the Court and Plaintiff. ISSUES REQUIRING CLARIFICATION 1. Plaintiff...

After review, the Court has noticed issues that would harm this case in a default judgement. In order to provide the plaintiffs the opportunity to address these issues, this case is no longer in recess and the prior response to the Motion for Default Judgement is rescinded.

The Motion for Default Judgement is granted with the added knowledge that Defendant is no longer contesting this case. The previously issued Order to Stay Proceedings is rescinded, and the Court shall now enter recess pending the Default Judgement.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Privacy Matters v. Vanguard Securities LLC [2025] FCR 36 ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS I'll be the new presiding officer. The case will be paused while the Court reestablishes contact with both parties. This trial is set to continue in 48 hours.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT lucaaasserole v. FearlessNacktmul [2025] DCR 45 VERDICT 1. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION 1. Defendant trespassed on Plaintiff’s private property, plot R048. Defendant repeatedly killed Plaintiff in the basement of said property. 2. Defendant...

The Court will now enter recess pending a verdict.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Maxib02 v. DocTheory [2025] DCR 46 ORDER OF DISMISSAL The claims for relief in the complaint are based on defunct laws. The Criminal Code Act (or "CCA") Part I § 4 provides that, "Where any other Act, regulation, directive, or rule conflicts...

It seems that a portion of the money withheld from Plaintiff was originally their own. That fact does raise concerns related to these statutes. You may continue to develop your interpretative arguments, but the Motion to Dismiss is denied. Discovery shall now begin and will be set to end 72...

A question for either party: was a portion of the total amount a buy-in from Plaintiff, as suggested in P-003, or did Plaintiff start the game with none of their own money?

Plaintiff shall have 24 hours to provide a response to the Motion to Dismiss. Discovery is temporarily postponed until further notice.

You have 72 hours from the time of this post to file an Answer to Complaint.

@DocsTheory is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Maxib02 v. DocTheory [2025] DCR 46.

Defendant has 48 hours from the time of this post to file a Closing Statement.