Search results

The Court understands the situation with plot r054 and agrees with the choice to not reacquire it. The request to return the remaining plots back to Plaintiff is granted.

Granted.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT YourLocalDiabeto v jb4bass [2025] FCR 79 ORDER SUA SPONTE DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The Constitution § 18(1) enumerates the types of cases the Federal Court has original jurisdiction over, "(a) Questions of constitutionality...

It is recognized that Defendant has been permanently deported and therefore does not enjoy a right to representation. See UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2. From here on, Defendant will not partake in the case, but the arguments made prior to the deportation will still be considered since they...

I will take this to mean that you are being hired by the DOJ as a prosecutor. You may represent the Commonwealth on the condition that you're hired as a prosecutor in the next 72 hours. If you are not hired by then, you will no longer be allowed to represent the Commonwealth. You have 48 hours...

@End, the objection raises significant concerns whether there is legal authority for what the executive branch is attempting to do in these two cases. Though the Court understands the situation the Commonwealth is currently in, this situation is not a reason to act in ways contrary to law. To...

I'll be the new presiding judge. The Court will remain in recess while getting up to date with the case.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Lex Titanum v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 72 SUA SPONTE DISMISSING FOR LACK OF VALID CLAIM I. CONSTITUTION § 32(9) The Constitution § 32(9) reads, “Any citizen, criminal or otherwise will have the right to a speedy and fair trial...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Lex Titanum v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 72 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court is considering sua sponte dismissing this case pursuant to Court Rules and Procedures Rule 2.2, for failing to state a valid claim, given that the Constitution...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Privacy Matters v. Nexalin [2025] FCR 36 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Since Defendant failed to amend their Answer to Complaint and demonstrated a lack of interest in pursuing this case, the Motion for Default Judgment is granted...

The Attorney General, @gribble19, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EMERGENCY...

Defendant has 72 hours from the time of this post to file an Opening Statement.

You may.

Plaintiff has 72 hours from the time of this post to file an opening statement.

Extension granted.

Notification and update on this. The judgement will be ready to be posted 24 hours after the time the quoted post was made. If a brief is not filed before then, it will not be considered in the judgement.

@ToadKing, please provide a brief explaining the purpose of requesting punitive damages on behalf of the other 33 users. As a class action group, do you plan to distribute winnings amongst the other users not listed as plaintiffs in this case? In the brief, you may include any other information...

It is correct that Plaintiff filed the appeal on behalf of their client, BrustkleFurry, but the purpose of the appeal was to seek legal fees. _lucaaa_ v. BrustkleFurry [2024] DCR 43 - Appeal. Since these fees would have been payable to Plaintiff, it is reasonable to say that the delay affected...

Granted.

You have 48 hours from the time of this post to file an Answer to Complaint.