Search results

  1. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    MOTION TO DISMISS "NotADoctor9218" is not the Plaintiff. "Doc" is. As the person in this screenshot does not have the same name as the Plaintiff, this case should be dismissed without prejudice until such time as it is filed on behalf of the actual Plaintiff, or the actual Plaintiff appears.
  2. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Doc Plaintiff v. qsdt Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRM The plaintiff, Doc, was offered 5k Redmont Dollars in order to kill the defendant, qsdt. 2. AFFIRM the Plaintiff rejected the offer. 3. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR...
  3. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS TheGreat_Boi has not provided proof of representation, making the initial case filing invalid. This case should be dismissed without prejudice.
  4. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    I have no further questions
  5. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    No more questions, your honor.
  6. Dartanboy

    Appeal: Denied [2025] FCR 58 - Appeal

    MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION We ask that while this appeal is pending, "realtor-only" auctions be frozen, as allowing them to continue will cause irreversible harm by permanently making the plots my client wishes to bid on unavailable to him.
  7. Dartanboy

    Appeal: Denied [2025] FCR 58 - Appeal

    The New Evidence Mentioned
  8. Dartanboy

    Appeal: Denied [2025] FCR 58 - Appeal

    Username: Dartanboy I am representing a client Who is your Client?: MrFluffy2U94 File(s) attached What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] FCR 58 Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Dismissed - MrFluffy2U94 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 58 Basis for Appeal: New Evidence & Unfair...
  9. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MrFluffy2U94 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 58

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS ON LACK OF CLAIM Your honor, we are alleging a Constitutional Violation. The Defense makes strange arguments, which will be addressed: "[The Plaintiff] provides no evidence that professional qualification...
  10. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    Your honor, Justice Compass will no longer be representing Vanguard as their retainer has expired. I believe they still want to continue this case. I hope you will allow Vanguard time to find new counsel.
  11. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Privacy Matters v. Nexalin [2025] FCR 36

    Your honor, Justice Compass will no longer be representing Vanguard as their retainer has expired.
  12. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MrFluffy2U94 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 58

    Your honor, this might be the longest Motion to Dismiss I've ever seen. May we have a 24 hour extension? Edit: It is also a weekday and this deadline is just half an hour after I get off work. Please allow me to work on this on Saturday.
  13. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MrFluffy2U94 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 58

    Your honor, may we respond to the motion to dismiss?
  14. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    CALLS FOR CONCLUSION These questions ask the witness for their opinion on whether something constituted an "emergency"
  15. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE Unless I missed something, there is no evidence DonTrillions reported Vanguard for anything.
  16. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    CALLS FOR CONCLUSION These questions ask for opinions (e.g. whether something was a "positive" or good thing).
  17. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE As the Commonwealth did not have a warrant, if the Secretary has knowledge of this he searched without a warrant.
  18. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    4. Are there any other actual, provable damages beyond "feeling belittled?" 5. What evidence do you have that v__d is the cause of these damages?
  19. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Privacy Matters v. Nexalin [2025] FCR 36

    MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honor, I have informed the Defendant multiple times to provide the documents or explain why they're unavailable, and he keeps making excuses about being at work, the gym, school, etc. I ask you do not find us, his counsel, guilty of Contempt.
  20. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    BREACH OF PROCEDURE The Commonwealth posted 4 hours after their already-extended deadline. This is the 2nd time they've showed disregard for standard court procedures in this case. EDIT: Nope, I'm just really bad at reading the time, I guess. Please overrule.
Back
Top