Search results

As the claims for relief expand to the scope of congressional oversight over Judicial FOIs as a whole, the plaintiff requests that *all* lodged since the passing of this act be presented for the sake of transparency. Realistically, the plaintiff does not believe this would be too much of a...

Welcome to the DOC! Join the discord and look for your channel

Welcome to the DOC! Join the discord and look for your channel

Welcome to the DOC! Join the discord and look for your channel

MOTION TO COMPEL The plaintiff wishes to compel the following from the commonwealth; Discussion in congressional chats about any of the following; Intending to submit judicial FOIs Intending to see judicial verdicts Discussion around Judicial Classifications. The plaintiff sees these to be...

The Plaintiff denies this request, sorry multi

As it pertains to this case, the general public is a relevant party to the application of the law as it pertains to this case. Colloquially, this is what is known as a public interest case. Through congressional override of the balance of power, the ability for Congress to bully the courts into...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RELEVANCE I fail to see the relevance to this. I have already stated that I was not involved in the original formation of the bill, and that they listed me as a cosponsor without my written consent. Either I am committing Perjury, or the more...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMMEND The Plaintiff will be amending their case filing for the following: 9. Before the repeal of the original classification act, the power of Judicial FOI appeals was vested within the Federal Court. 7. Part IV, Section 32...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL The Plaintiff wishes to compel the following from the Commonwealth 1) Any discussion within Congress chat relating to the Passing of the current CMA 2) Any motions regarding Judicial FOI Appeals 3) Discussions surrounding...

To my knowledge, none exists that I can access until the WPR chats are recovered Even then, the chats there were publicly available by anyone with the opt-in legislative role, and I don't think I made any comment to EATB about the bill in particular [this was multiple months ago at this time...

I did not read the bill at the time of it being originally put up, and would not have an opinion on it. If I were to have read it, I would have found it to be unconstitutional.

I was never made aware of this actually! I don't have the screenshots as they were in the WPR legislative channel [which I am no longer affiliated with], but I was the most likely listed as cosponsor due to the fact that I was the person to originally come up with the idea of updating the...

This is what is provided publicly, within any server I am in that is affiliated with DC. I ended up not following through with co-counciling with Dino, who is now acting AG. As I am a solo practitioner in this case, a lot of my stuff is not shared in any available format.

There are two main arguments about how the standing application does not apply here; 1) Application of law does, in fact, harm me or another relevant party directly. Congressional Oversight over FOI requests provides a gaping hole in the ability to properly keep cases and discussions of...

Requesting a 12 hour extension from the default 24 for response, currently babysitting my brother out of the house :)

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, I plead oopsie daisy. If it would please the court; IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion to Amend The plaintiff seeks to modify the following in the complaint; Change the hyperlink from...

Permission to respond, your honor?

Breach of procedure. The commonwealth replied after the 72 hour deadline had elapsed. as per the writ of summons, proper procedure to default judgement should be applied.

Your application has been denied at this time.