Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND The Plaintiff seeks to add the following additional facts to the FACTS section of the Case Filing: 8. The Commonwealth did not confront xEndeavour with any evidence when charging him in #government-announcements [P-001...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND The Plaintiff seeks to amend the Case Filing FACTS section as follows: II. FACTS Note: All times will be in Central Daylight Time, as that is my timezone. 1. On August 5 at 11:04 AM, Speaker Omegabiebel made an announcement...

Your Honor, Opposing counsel has indeed introduced many new facts, new case links, etc. I will do my best to avoid responding to those as you have mentioned they are being disregarded. That said, the Closing Statement provided is quite large and it is possible I may intersect with it at times...

Your honor, may I have a 24 hour extension due to IRL circumstances?

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION xEndeavour (Justice Compass, Ltd. representing) Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. xEndeavour (Plaintiff) 2. Commonwealth of...

Your honor, Might I file an Amicus Curiae Brief regarding the additional damages requested for the 116 non-plaintiff users? This will be strictly factual and unrelated to any relationship I had with the Defendant prior.

Introduction Good Morning, Hon. Ameslap. This brief seeks to provide only facts and legal analysis, without bias for either party. On Dearev's Political Affiliations and its Implications Dearev is a member of the Workers' Party of Redmont (WPR) This isn't inherently an issue, however it...

Good evening, Honorable and Learned Judge Ameslap. As a political independent, longstanding lawyer, and former Chief Justice, I seek the opportunity to provide an Amicus Curiae Brief going over the following facts: Dearev's political affiliations xEndeavour's history with the Defendant...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECUSE We have awaited a verdict for nearly two months now. We request either: Commitment to a verdict within 7 days' time, or; Recusal for another Judicial Officer to take over.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT The Contracts Act clearly states that "An offer is a clear and unequivocal communication expressing a party's willingness to enter into a contract" "Okay 10k?" fails to meet that definition, especially noting the...

Due to IRL circumstances at work, I also request a further 12h extension if the case is not dismissed.

Your honor, I believe this timeline has expired again.

Your honor, I believe this time has elapsed. We would also request a 24h extension for the Defense's Opening Statement if the case is not dismissed.

MOTION TO DISMISS Your honor, Long-standing precedent in all three courts dictates that when a Plaintiff fails to pursue the case, it is dismissed. See [2021] DCR 69 - Lawsuit: Dismissed - lawanoesepr v. Admin23 [2021] DCR 69 [2022] FCR 89 - Lawsuit: Dismissed - Matthew100x & xLayzur v. The...

(I was able to finish over lunch - sorry for asking for the unneeded extension) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your honor, This case is nothing but a cash-grab... an attempt to take money from my client for using his constitutional right to political...

Your honor, May I be permitted a 1 hour extension as I will be just getting off work at the current deadline.

MOTION TO DISMISS "NotADoctor9218" is not the Plaintiff. "Doc" is. As the person in this screenshot does not have the same name as the Plaintiff, this case should be dismissed without prejudice until such time as it is filed on behalf of the actual Plaintiff, or the actual Plaintiff appears.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Doc Plaintiff v. qsdt Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRM The plaintiff, Doc, was offered 5k Redmont Dollars in order to kill the defendant, qsdt. 2. AFFIRM the Plaintiff rejected the offer. 3. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS TheGreat_Boi has not provided proof of representation, making the initial case filing invalid. This case should be dismissed without prejudice.

I have no further questions