IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Vernicia (Represented by Dragon Law Firm)
Plaintiff
v.
Tonga1 (Represented by zLost)
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defence affirms Fact 1, however denies that the names ‘Vernicia’ ‘Bezzer’ were clearly visible...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE
These statements are irrelevant, due to the fact that the Plaintiff ran as an independant and the RPP's policies are not being brought into question.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS
The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed under Rule 5.14 (Factual Error), and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1. The Plaintiff has stated an easily proveable false fact in their complaint...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY
This statements are false, as we can see in the Plaintiff's own evidence, the campaign message received a total of 11 'fire' reactions, not 13. The Plaintiff provided this evidence themselves and even repeated this...
The Plaintiff wishes to amend their prayers for relief as follows:
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. RylandW be re-instated as Representative instead of bigpappa140. A recount of the election to be done using the Gregory system.
2. $20,000 $5,000 in...
A
BILL
To
Add Assassinations to the Law
The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law:
1 - Short Title...
The Plaintiff will accept summary judgement if $5,000 extra is added on top for punitive damages, for a total of $20,000 in damages ($5,000 punitive, $10,000 loss of enjoyment, $5,000 legal fees).
The Plaintiff declines summary judgement as RylandW would've won whether Gregory or Last Parcel was used, therefore the point still stands that the DoS misled the courts to remove RylandW's position.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
RylandW (Represented by zLost)
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
I. PARTIES
1. RylandW
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont
II. FACTS
1. On...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF COURT PROCEDURE
Court Policy regarding motions (link) states the following:
Only one motion to reconsider can be made per decision, with all arguments included in a single submission.
Following this policy, the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.