Your Honor
The Plaitiff is trying to dodge what he knows will break his Case. The doest want to hear the witnesses because it will break his Case. We wish that the witnesses be heared we see no problem with the questions.
1. Witnesses do you know BabySoga did ever do anything harmful on purpose during the Football Event?
2. @lucaaaaMC as BabySogas Boss were there any mismanagements of money you were aware of?
3. @Mask3D_WOLF were there mistakes made by BabySoga, if any what were they during the Event?
4. @RspDMcd...
1. Witnesses do you know BabySoga did ever do anything harmful on purpose?
2. @lucaaaaMC as BabySogas Boss were there any mismanagements of money?
3. @Mask3D_WOLF were there mistakes made by BabySoga, if any what were they?
4. @RspDMcd since you are believed to have sat above the Goal Posts do...
Motion to reconsider in the DCR
Your Honor,
You ruled on his Objection within 5-6 hrs of it being published this has never been done with a non-absent Defendant therefore I wish that the Defence gets to respond before a Objection gets ruled upon.
Motion to reconsider in the DCR
Your Honor,
You ruled on his Objection within 5-6 hrs of it being published this has never been done with a non-absent Defendant therefore I wish that the Defence gets to respond before a Objection gets ruled upon.
1. Witnesses do you think BabySoga would ever do anything harmful?
2. @lucaaaaMC as BabySogas Boss were there any mismanagements of money?
3. @Mask3D_WOLF were there mistakes made by BabySoga, if any what do you think they were?
4. @RspDMcd since you are believed to have sat above the Goal Posts...
<br>IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT<br>OPENING STATEMENT<br>
Your Honor,
<br> The Plaintiff is making his point on my Past but while you think about that how did I become the deputy secretary? How did I become a EVM/CXM and member of leadership? The Plaintiff is...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY
The Defendant is clear that the score is correct. The Plaintiff is lying outrageously in this Court. We wish the Court strike this from the opening statement. We wish that the Court also interpret P-004 [/CENTER]
Well the Plaintiff is disregarding somethings, he cant tell the court exactly how CLAIM 1,2 and partially 3 have anything to do with the Plaintiffs standing. I was a deputy secretary so even this would have been in my scope of permission. Just because a possible "breach of a procedure" happend...
BRIEF - DISMISSAL
The Plaintiff could not prove any intent in harming the Plaintiff. The Employer in most cases shall be the one liable. I believe that this "intent in harming" should be something like corruption or other means involve a personal gain/interest. It really makes sense why the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.