Search results

Corrected Case: see xEndeavour v. Commonwealth [2023] SCR 22. The SCR deferred on interfering with a political situation, in where political communication is undoubtedly involved. Counselor, this is not an invitation for a conversation. If you respond to this thread asking the Court to explain...

Counsel, you are throwing stones in a glass house. You’re arguing that opposing counsel’s statements make them a witness, yet by the same logic, your own involvement could subject you to the same challenge. if you have additional remarks or wish to question the Court, do so in a motion; The...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order to Dismiss, with prejudice - Motion to Dismiss #2, BezzerGeezer Plaintiff, in its complaint, wished to proffer to the Court that he was harmed by Defendant’s failure to uphold a contract effected between Parties. Defendant counters...

Proceed, you shall have 24 hours.

P-002 shows a conversation between yourself and pricelessAgrari. If the Court accepts that pricelessAgrari is a unsummoned witness and should be dismissed, the Court will likewise require new representation for the Gazette. The same image you point to can be used to impeach you. Denied.

Wrong case included, nonetheless the Court's view doesn't change. You're asking for extraordinary relief for an action that may be reasonably construed to be political communication.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER - Plaintiff's EI (#6) Denied, Two reasons, Defendant has a right to political communication. Since Defendant is a politician, the Court will defer on injunctive relief before rushing to stifling his speech. In reading Ko531 v...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER Denied, The existence of the harm is the reason Plaintiff* is suing right now. To order its deletion would be immensely prejudicial.

You shall have 72 hours to Answer to the Complaint.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER - [2025] DCR 72 (Inalite v. Plura72) Granted, with modification. Defendant shall remove the video specifically mentioned in P-004, if it is in part inclusive of P-002. Defendant is enjoined from posting new iterations of works...

@Plura72, is required to appear before the district Court in the case of RealImza v. Plura72 [2025] DCR 74 In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

@Plura72, is required to appear before the District Court in the case of The Redmont Gazette v. Plura72 In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

@Plura72 , is required to appear before the district Court in the case of Inalite v. Plura72 In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Plaintiff has not objected to the Motion to Dismiss within the allotted time. The Court is in recess pending its Order on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#33).

Denied. You submitted a Motion to Reconsider by stating the the property was undergoing an eviction. The Court already took note that the property was in the possession of AnimeInc in its original Order (#3). You attempted to make this Court reconsider its prior decision on the academic view...

Granted. I'll instruct the DHS to inform the Town of Aventura that the Writ is of no effect.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Writ of Mandamus - Town of Aventura The Head of Development for the Town of Aventura, @Epiphone335 , is requested to come and kindly answer a few questions for the Court. When was the notice given against av-c035 prior to eviction? Who and...

@Plura72 You have 48 hours to respond.

The Court accepts the consent of Parties to close Discovery. Plaintiff shall have 72 hours to give an Opening Statement; The Court continues to reserve its decision from earlier.

Before the Court actions this, are you sure you don't wish to perform any actions permissible prior to the end of Discovery?