Search results

  1. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    The Plaintiff denies this request, sorry multi
  2. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    As it pertains to this case, the general public is a relevant party to the application of the law as it pertains to this case. Colloquially, this is what is known as a public interest case. Through congressional override of the balance of power, the ability for Congress to bully the courts into...
  3. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RELEVANCE I fail to see the relevance to this. I have already stated that I was not involved in the original formation of the bill, and that they listed me as a cosponsor without my written consent. Either I am committing Perjury, or the more...
  4. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMMEND The Plaintiff will be amending their case filing for the following: 9. Before the repeal of the original classification act, the power of Judicial FOI appeals was vested within the Federal Court. 7. Part IV, Section 32...
  5. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL The Plaintiff wishes to compel the following from the Commonwealth 1) Any discussion within Congress chat relating to the Passing of the current CMA 2) Any motions regarding Judicial FOI Appeals 3) Discussions surrounding...
  6. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    To my knowledge, none exists that I can access until the WPR chats are recovered Even then, the chats there were publicly available by anyone with the opt-in legislative role, and I don't think I made any comment to EATB about the bill in particular [this was multiple months ago at this time...
  7. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    I did not read the bill at the time of it being originally put up, and would not have an opinion on it. If I were to have read it, I would have found it to be unconstitutional.
  8. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    I was never made aware of this actually! I don't have the screenshots as they were in the WPR legislative channel [which I am no longer affiliated with], but I was the most likely listed as cosponsor due to the fact that I was the person to originally come up with the idea of updating the...
  9. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    This is what is provided publicly, within any server I am in that is affiliated with DC. I ended up not following through with co-counciling with Dino, who is now acting AG. As I am a solo practitioner in this case, a lot of my stuff is not shared in any available format.
  10. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    There are two main arguments about how the standing application does not apply here; 1) Application of law does, in fact, harm me or another relevant party directly. Congressional Oversight over FOI requests provides a gaping hole in the ability to properly keep cases and discussions of...
  11. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    Requesting a 12 hour extension from the default 24 for response, currently babysitting my brother out of the house :)
  12. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, I plead oopsie daisy. If it would please the court; IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion to Amend The plaintiff seeks to modify the following in the complaint; Change the hyperlink from...
  13. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    Permission to respond, your honor?
  14. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    Breach of procedure. The commonwealth replied after the 72 hour deadline had elapsed. as per the writ of summons, proper procedure to default judgement should be applied.
  15. aubunny

    Denied Truffleboy123 - Economist Application

    Your application has been denied at this time.
  16. aubunny

    Accepted Muggy21 - Compliance Officer Application

    The Dept. Commerce has accepted your application! Please join the Discord and await further instructions.
  17. aubunny

    Accepted dodrio3 - Compliance Officer Application

    The Dept. Commerce has accepted your application! Please join the Discord and await further instructions.
  18. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION There is clear damage caused to the judiciary by allowing the congress to appeal FOI requests without proper oversight and judicial ruling. Therefor, for the duration of the injunction, I request The following be striked from the Classified Materials Act (b)...
  19. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION malka Plaintiff v. Commonwealth Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. malka 2. Commonwealth of Redmont II. FACTS 1. The Classified...
  20. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Plura72 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Plura72 Plaintiff v. Commonwealth Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The defense DENIES that the Department of the Interior has been committing animal abuse, more specifically, pet overcrowding and animal overcrowding...
Back
Top