Search results

I hereby issue the following: A permanent injunction to affirm Vendeka Inc. as the rightful owner of S015. I hereby order the DCT to cease eviction proceedings, and to transfer S015 to EmmDubz.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Vendeka Inc. vs Finsmt [2025] DCR 53 VERDICT 1. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION 1. Plaintiff transferred the property S015 to defendant as part of defendant's role as CEO. 2. Defendant resigned from their role as CEO, but failed to return the property...

Discovery has now ended. The plaintiff has 48 hours to give their Opening Statement.

Thank you. Court is in recess pending verdict.

Thank you. Please respond to this additional question: 1. Can you provide any evidence of a discussion or agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant, discussing the initial transfer of s015 to the defendant?

As Defendant has failed to reply, I will be granting the motion for summary judgement. However, in order to ensure the burden of proof is met, I will be asking several questions of the plaintiff. 1. Can you provide additional proof that s015 is property of Vendeka Inc?

Denied as Discovery is already being extended (see below). Have a safe trip. I'm not entirely sure what you're asking for permission to respond to, unless it's the objection? In which case, you do not require my permission to reply to objections. This is the first I am hearing of this...

"When was Reveille Legion registered?"

You may.

I will be extending Discovery while we await for the Attorney General to turn over the requested materials. The original deadline remains in effect (a bit less than 5 hours).

Overruled. That objection relates to evidence or witness questioning, not a defense in an Answer to Complaint. If plaintiff believes it to be irrelevant, they should have no issue proving such in court with their statements and evidence. Sustained at this time. However, please answer the...

Court is once again in recess pending verdict.

@finsmt is required to appear before the District Court of Redmont in the case of Vendeka Inc. vs Finsmt

Can the Defendant please explain the relevance of each witness?

As with the first objection, I am giving the defendant 24 hours to respond to the other objections.

The Defendant may respond if they so choose. Also, we will now enter Discovery. Discovery shall last 5 days, or may end sooner if both parties agree to such.

Motion to Dismiss is denied at this time. As the plaintiff has pointed out, the cited precedent does nothing to support the defendant's argument. However, this court is well aware of immunity protection. Ergo, I shall be conducting a thorough review of the evidence at the end of discovery to...

Granted.

You have 48 hours to file your Answer to Complaint.

I will be granting the Motion to Strike. Although there isn't concrete evidence to prove that the plaintiff was a full doctor at the time, both the plaintiff and the defendant (in their response) do not dispute this fact.