Search results

@gribble19 is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Omegabiebel - Expungement Request Please state whether you approve or deny this expungement request.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT The Federal Court has decided to Accept this appeal. The Federal Court hereby overrules Magistrate JunkCereal's decision to dismiss the case under rule 2.1 of the Court Rules and Procedure. The Magistrate makes the connection that in order to...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Following careful deliberation, the Federal Court has decided to deny this appeal. The court fails to see a true connection that would constitute what the plaintiff did as a bounty for the purposes of this law. Looking at the Make Bounties...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Following careful deliberation, the Federal Court has decided to deny this appeal. The procedure around the summoning of witnesses are not based in law but in Court rules and procedure. Rule 1.3 gives the plaintiff the ability to appeal court...

Granted. Gregg will be put on paid (if he even does get paid) suspension for the duration of this case.

The defense has 24 hours to cross examine the witnesses and ask their questions

@gribble19 is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of T04ds74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

@Gregg is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Gregg [2025] FCR 64

Denied. A public defender should be appointed shortly

Objection - Nothing Pending Sustained. The comment is struck Objection - Perjury Sustained in part, the Evidence may not show how long the plaintiff worked in the mine but it does show that more then half of the sentence was actually skipped and not served. Even though the fact of how much time...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Commonwealth of Redmont v. mc20masarati [2025] FCR 57 I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION 1. The defendant committed legal fraud by practicing law without any legal qualifications in fluffywaafelz v. undatheradar [2025] FCR 54 2. The defendant...

Granted Granted. Court is in recess pending verdict.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT zLost v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 52 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The plaintiff wishes the Federal court determine whether Oakridge election data is justly classified as allowed by the Classification Act. 2. If the Oakridge...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Vernicia v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 51 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. Due to the plaintiff owning a volt bank account the DOC's imposed bank holiday violates the plaintiffs 15th right for being an unreasonable seizure of assets...

I am dismissing this case Sua Sponte under rule 2.1 for lack of standing. Standing requires three elements and this case has a glaring hole with the second requirement "The cause of injury was against the law." By the plaintiff's own facts, the comment in which caused the alleged damages was...

Granted

Does the plaintiff have any follow up questions?

I am denying this motion in part. This case is being moved to the Supreme Court as I do not have the authority or power to rule and decide cases involving the removal or banning of office. This case however is not being dismissed and only moved to the SC as to not waste this trial. I see no...

The defense has 72 hours to provide their closing statement

You may