Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION FireMatt_N (Lex Titanum Representing) Plaintiff v. CatBoi27 Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. FireMatt_N - Plaintiff 2...

IN THE DISTRIC COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Dodrio3 Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. Commonwealth Of Redmont - Defendant 2...

Your Honour, The Defence has alleged that the Plaintiff’s counsel committed perjury by stating that the Plaintiff has not committed a violent crime in the past two months. This allegation is unfounded. The Plaintiff’s counsel approximated the timeframe to the nearest month. By that measure, it...

P-004 =

Your honour may move on?

If requested the plaintiff will provide this evidence. we just didn't want to miss the deadline

Your Honour, The Defence has suggested that the Plaintiff must prove the absence of corruption by producing every Discord message he has ever sent, every voice chat he has ever joined, or even game replay recordings. Such an expectation is wholly unreasonable and disproportionate. The burden...

The plaitiff request that they be allowed to present additional evidence to aid the response.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE As per court procedure witnesses are called after opening statements the defence has continual asked for them to be called in the wrong place and I request all instances of this be stricken and the defendant...

1. Perjury is when "When a witness intentionally lies or misrepresents facts under oath. Proof of perjury should be presented with the objection." I am not a witness their for I am not subject to an objection due to perjury 2. The evidence in P-004 clearly shows that the goals were caught by a...

Employees Paid

Your Honnor, The Defendant has shown us nothing but a past of misconduct and abuse within the department. This event is not a one off event that has occurred, the defendant has set a precedent of malicious actions that have now resulted in a loss of the plaintiff. Actions such as these have...

The plaintiff requests an additional 24h to post and opening statment

Your Honour, Both cases presented by the Defence — [2025] FCR 78 and [2023] FCR 27 — involved government employees acting within the scope of their duties, without any removal from office or history of misconduct. In contrast, the present case concerns an individual with a documented record of...

I am waiting for a response within the closed court as the wether i am allowed to use some information in the public thread.

May the plaitiff respond to some of the points in the defences statement?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Lex Titanum (Formerly Titan Law) Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. Lex...

The Defence’s claim to immunity rests on the hollow premise that working under the Department of Public Affairs somehow shields them from any personal liability. This is a distortion of both law and logic. Immunity for police officers exists to protect necessary law enforcement actions from...

Your Honour, With respect, I question the necessity of this step. To my knowledge, such a stage is not outlined as part of the official court procedure under the Court Rules. Discovery has already concluded, and the next procedural step would ordinarily be to proceed with option statements or...

When the DCT replied For s075 27 days For s076 14 days When the actuon was won S075 28 days S076 24 days