Search results

1. As established in Cope Holdings v Vanguard Market Access [2025] FCR 62, VMA was created using the /db command system and was owned in-game by Nexalin under the business "VMA" (P-013). This demonstrates direct personal ownership and operation by Nexalin as an individual. 2. Under Business...

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff amends the Complaint as follows: Privacy Matters Collective (Class Action Group Represented by Mezimori) Plaintiff v. Vanguard Securities LLC  Nexalin Defendant This amendment is made to reflect the fact that "Vanguard Securities...

A BILL To Facilitate the Creation of a State-Owned Withdrawal Facility and Ease the Economy After the Financial Collapse The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the...

A BILL To Establish Standards for Conflicts of Interest in Government and Judicial Appointments. The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby...

For recording reasons, the vote tally was 11-0-0 (House) and 4-0-1 (Senate) before the revote. Revote records: HOR: 5-2-0 ; Senate: 4-0-0 A BILL To Amend the Text Me Back Act The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI The Plaintiff wishes to drop this lawsuit after reaching an out-of-court agreement with the Defendant.

Plaintiff requests to amend their response, as this now changes the Motion to Dismiss.

TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honour, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be DENIED. GROUNDS: 1. Contrary to Defendant's false assertion that "Plaintiff has not opposed any of these six requests, nor did Plaintiff respond to any of these six requests," Plaintiff...

The Plaintiff requests a response to this motion.

OBJECTION - NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, the Plaintiff specifically requested "Any CABINET classified discussions about Plaintiff's termination and any other classified or confidential communications about firing Plaintiff.". This response fails to answer the discovery request. Pursuant to Rule...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL The Plaintiff moves that the Court compel the Defendant to produce the documents requested, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. Privacy Act Section 4(1) establishes "Accessibility to your own private information"...

OBJECTION - ASKED AND ANSWERED Your Honour, the Plaintiff has already answered these document requests, and it appears the Defence is trying to skirt around this answer by amending their requests without any substantive changes.

As previously stated, I invoke my right under PART IV Section (32)(5) of the Constitution to not produce self-incriminating evidence.

The witness list will remain as: 1. Juniperfig 2. Gribble19 I invoke my right under PART IV Section (32)(5) of the Constitution. Updated questions: 1. How would the Plaintiff's continued employment have been "a detriment to the workflow and reputation of the Department of Justice"? 2. Why is...

The employees listed were employed at the same time as the Plaintiff. Whilst not all may have directly worked with the Plaintiff, they may have seen his work and can speak to his performance and character.

As has been rightfully pointed out, this document request was perhaps overly excessive. Pursuant to Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Plaintiff updates the initial discovery request and asks the Defendant to produce the following materials relevant to the case: 1...

All requested messages are protected by Attorney-Client Privilege, as defined in Section (8)(4) Modern Legal Reform Act, as they may have occurred between Plaintiff and clients in private Discord DMs, MZLD retainer channels, and consultation tickets. These communications are legally privileged...

TO OBJECTION All listed witnesses are DOJ employees who worked with Plaintiff during his employment period and can provide relevant testimony about his work performance and character. The Defendant has specifically DENIED in their Answer (8) that Plaintiff's legal work was "exemplary", making...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR CLOSED COURT SESSION Your Honor, The Plaintiff is requesting a Closed Court Session on the basis that certain evidence relevant to this case is classified to a CABINET level, specifically relating to the Discord server titled...