Search results

What is the relevance of a former DCT Secretary in a trial related to the DPA?

Regidrago

Those who have been already yes

The emergency injunction is granted, the court finds it neccesary to expand the current limitations set by the original EI in order to prevent potential harm. Secretary xDarkkex and any Acting Secretaries are temporarily prohibited from terminating or disciplining DPA employees for the remainder...

Extension granted.

The Motion to Reconsider is granted. We will now be moving onto Discovery, which will last 24 hours starting from this moment.

In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court denies the appeal. The claim of $100,000 for emotional damages is in the opinion of this court an attempt to receive as much money as possible rather than a genuine reflection of the Plaintiff's suffering. The plaintiff has already received $67,000 and an...

The Supreme Court denies the appeal. We find no error in the Federal Court's verdict. The Commonwealth failed to appear despite being properly summoned, and it was within the authority of the Federal Court to issue a default ruling based on the known facts of the case.

The motion for summary judgement is granted. This case is now in recess pending verdict.

You have 48 hours to present your Answer to Complaint

The Supreme Court of Redmont will be granting a modified Emergency Injunction. Secretary xDarkkex is temporarily restrained from changing any policy within the Department of Public Affairs for the duration of the case or until further orders of this Court. This will not prevent any day-to-day...

@Attorney General's Office is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of zLost v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 10.

The appeal is hereby granted, and the case is remanded to the District Court. This Court finds that there were errors in the dismissal of the case, specifically in how the alleged defamation and the claim regarding loss of enjoyment were assessed. These are issues that must be properly reviewed...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The prosecution argues that the defendant commited bribery by offering $10,000 to any citizen who voted for a specific candidate during the Oakridge mayoral election. 2. The Prosecution stated that this...

In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to do a Summary Judgement in favor of the plaintiff due to the defendant being banned from the server. We apologize for the extreme tardiness as I have personally have gone through IRL long term issues.

In a 3-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to reject the appeal. We believe that the original verdict was supported by clear evidence and legal reasoning. We will not tolerate the way in which the judge from the original case has been treated in this appeal. The Supreme Court thanks...

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to reject the appeal. The dismissal of the case correctly concluded that the plaintiff failed to establish a legal basis for relief. Punitive damages need to be plead correctly in the claims for relief establishing what facts lead to "outrageous"...

In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to reject this appeal. You cannot speak on an active court post without explicit permission from the Judicial Officers. Obstructing court proceedings does qualify as contempt and you did that more than once. We find that it is justified to uphold...

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to reject the appeal. We find no error in the dismissal of the case, the appeal has continued to fail to establish any standing.

In a 3-0 decision the Supreme Court accepts the Plea Deal and asks the DHS to carry out the punishments listed.