Search results

  1. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed T04DS74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

    OBJECTION - PERJURY Many of the employees listed, myself included, did not work with Plaintiff directly. They therefore cannot provide relevant testimony about his work performance or character, having never interacted with him.
  2. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed T04DS74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

    OBJECTION - Relevance Plaintiff has resorted to calling every single member of the department, whether ever even having an interaction with him or not, as witnesses. Defense requests that it be ordered that plaintiff's witness list be consolidated, or that the specific relevance of every...
  3. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. Gregg [2025] FCR 64

    May I file an amicus brief, as a Captain of the police force?
  4. Mask3D_WOLF

    Happy Birthday

    Happy Birthday
  5. Mask3D_WOLF

    Combine your username with the one above you!

    Babysoga4D_REAL
  6. Mask3D_WOLF

    Combine your username with the one above you!

    Mask77D_TALION
  7. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Munkler v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 42

    Objection - Relevance Evidence piece P-009 is not relevant to this case. This case is not dealing with the similarity of houses, nor anyone saying hello, or other random messages. The defense therefore moves that it be stricken and the plaintiff be sanctioned.
  8. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Munkler v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 42

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, alleges: 1. The plaintiff, Munkler, failed to prove that they exhausted all means of resolving the charge with the DHS before filing a...
  9. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Munkler v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 42

    May I file an amicus brief on the applications of the right against unreasonable search and seizure to this case?
  10. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Class Action Group v. Plura72 [2025] DCR 40

    May I file an amicus brief on the precedent regarding class action lawsuits, specifically applied to this?
  11. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

    Could we please get an extension of this to 48 hours?
  12. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion to Reconsider Regardless of the relevance, this is an extremely important point of law to rule upon nonetheless. I especially ask you to reconsider seeing as the objection was hastily ruled upon with no response from opposing counsel...
  13. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Objection - Breach of Procedure The plaintiff spoke out of turn to improperly speak and retract his questions.
  14. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion to Reconsider Normally, a motion to reconsider would not be filed for a decision supported by the party filing. When a verdict such as this is based on such snarky and legally unsound statements, however, this is filed in the interest...
  15. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

    The Department can very well produce someone who can do it, however that is not within the expertise of a prosecutor who joined yesterday. Would you like me to pass the message onto another person in the department, perhaps?
  16. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Objection - Incompetent The legal representative for the Commonwealth, a State Prosecutor, is not an expert on any questions listed. This question is not within her official purview as a state prosecutor, and she should therefore not be called...
  17. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion to Strike Witness's comments regarding licking and arousing were out of line, irrelevant, and/or sexual. The defense therefore moves to strike them from the record.
  18. Mask3D_WOLF

    Lawsuit: Adjourned End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Objection - Leading Plaintiff is asking a leading question, asking to confirm a narrative that he presented. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Objection - Arguing with witness, Leading Plaintiff is clearly arguing with and...
  19. Mask3D_WOLF

    WHOS BETTER DOCTER

    certified DC classic
  20. Mask3D_WOLF

    .

    .
Back
Top