Search results

  1. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    If I have missed anything, please let me know. With all the new motions it is easy to accidentally skip one.
  2. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    Granted. The Commonwealth has 72 hours to produce the information requested. Go ahead.
  3. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    Motion to Reconsider Denied. The SCR ruling does not leave a binding precedent on this case. The case cited, [2025] SCR 14, explores a potential mishandling of the Executive Standards Act and does not involve any constitutional arguments as this one does. The public shall retain the right to...
  4. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    This is on hold until we get the WPR chats.
  5. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    Go ahead and amend the complaint if you haven't already. Granted. The WPR is compelled to submit the messages as described by the subpoena within the next 72 hours.
  6. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    Denied on the basis that the Objection Guide only defines Non-responsive remarks to witnesses and not to interrogatories. That being said, the Plaintiff is compelled to answer the second part of the question truthfully and to the best of their ability.
  7. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    I shall deny these motions. I do not want to get this court sidetracked with every classification law and get away from the core question: Judicial FOI Requests. You can reach out to these individuals for information but I will not be compelling them to provide them. I will grant these motions...
  8. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    Please explain the purpose to the court. This is broad-reaching and dates back years and I am inclined to deny anything that is rescinded or no longer relevant to the current Classified Materials Act.
  9. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned National Exchange of Redmont v. Mustafa Masody [2025] FCR 88

    Thank you for the reminder! So many cases hard to keep track of which ones are which. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT Verdict The Court accepts this settlement. The DHS is ordered to do the following: 1. Fine Mustafa Masody (ign: east_atlanta) $303,177.12 in damages and legal fees. 2. Unfine...
  10. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    I will hold off for the time being as you have an interrogatory out to the Plaintiff on this very question. Additionally, I am reviewing everything. Granted. The Plaintiff is asked to turn over all communications by the end of discovery.
  11. ameslap

    Expungement: Granted Franciscus - Expungement Request

    Don't know how this fell through the cracks but lets seeeeeeee: @asexualdinosaur please come hither for the expungement request of Multiman155 and let me know if you approve or not.
  12. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

    Granted. Once discovery begins please amend the evidence to the correct link. Granted. Also note that you may amend all you want during discovery as long as you notify the court. Motion denied. As Judge Nacho put it in [2024] - FCR 33: Now then, Discovery is now open and shall last for 5...
  13. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dodrio3 v. PurpleBG [2025] FCR 77

    I shall allow it. The court is in recess pending the verdict. Thank you.
  14. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Pending Yeet_Boy v. The Department of Public Affairs [2025] FCR 90

    Granted. All Parties are to make themselves known in the Judiciary Discord for the closed court. Granted. This case is enjoined and shall not move forward until FCR 85 has concluded.
  15. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    Please join the Judiciary Discord and ping me when you arrive.
  16. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    Alright so we will be entering a short recess while I look through everything and get us back on track. Discovery ended on August 24 as it was not extended by the previous Judge or myself since. I will attempt to have everything in order tomorrow, the request for a 3.6 Default is noted. During...
  17. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dodrio3 v. PurpleBG [2025] FCR 77

    Denied. The court finds that the statement, while misleading, was not knowingly false by the Plaintiff's Counsel. The court will disregard that portion of the closing statement in its deliberations. Sustained. The court shall disregard this portion of the closing statement in its deliberations...
Back
Top