Search results

  1. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Sustained. The comments in the evidence submissions will be struck. You may respond. Overruled. Staff has been called as a witness. They can be cross-examined. Denied. The court is satisfied with the Plaintiff's explanation of P-004's relevance.
  2. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    This objection has been sustained. The evidence submitted by the Defence does not show that AlexanderLove was legally qualified to practice in the FCR or hired by MZ at the time of his postings. The screenshots submitted by the Defence are timestamped March 24 at 11:14pm. This is, in every...
  3. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    The court hereby warns you for speaking out of turn. Any further unprompted comments will result in a contempt of court charge. The Defence must provide evidence that AlexanderLove was legally qualified to practice in the FCR and was employed by MZ at the time of his postings. The Defence has...
  4. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    This objection has been overruled. There is no definitive proof of how many clues a murder produces, and the Plaintiff has not shown proof of intent to mislead.
  5. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Boomsides and Pepecuu v. Lucaa7377 [2025] FCR 10

    Greetings. I will be taking over as presiding officer for this case.
  6. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    The Plaintiff now has 48 hours to present questions to the witness. The witnesses have a further 48 hours to answer, after which any follow-up questions may be asked within a further 48 hours, and so on.
  7. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    @Staff Team is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of MysticPhunky v. Naezaratheus.
  8. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Bank of Reveille v. Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) [2025] FCR 22

    The decision to change the presiding officer mid-case was made in the interest of upholding the right to a speedy trial. Given Kai's substantial caseload, the courts determined reassignment would be appropriate.
  9. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Bank of Reveille v. Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) [2025] FCR 22

    Greetings. I will be taking over as presiding officer for this case.
  10. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Krisztie v. zko0 [2025] FCR 13

    The motion for summary judgement is denied, as there are disputed facts. However, the Defence has missed the deadline for their closing statement and has offered no explanation. The court will hereby enter recess pending verdict. Also, greetings. I will be taking over as presiding officer for...
  11. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MysticPhunky V. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 26

    Greetings. I will be taking over as presiding officer for this case. Thank you both for your opening statements. Witness summons are to follow. You may submit a motion to strike with your reasoning if you wish for the statement to be struck.
  12. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned GnomeWhisperer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 11

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT May it please the court. GnomeWhisperer was wrongfully imprisoned. The law was clear—his sentence should have been 60 minutes, yet he was given three days and eight hours. Even though the Defense claims he only served three...
  13. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nebrasken64 [2025] FCR 23

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO NULLE PROSEQUI The Prosecution would like to drop all charges. This case was brought forth at the direction of a former employee, and the Department of Justice no longer agrees with the intention behind the case. I would like to...
  14. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned GnomeWhisperer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 11

    My apologies, your honour. I had mistakenly entered this into my calendar as a 72 hour deadline, not a 48 hour deadline. The Defence was granted over a week to question their witness. In the interest of fairness, I request a late extension. I am prepared to present my questions to the witness...
  15. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Your honour, this more than double the time allotted for discovery. The Plaintiff could have acquired this information prior to filing their lawsuit.
  16. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned GnomeWhisperer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 11

    Your Honour, to clarify, have you changed your mind about your statement regarding the evidence made here? Is the proof submitted by Dartanboy now admissible?
  17. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    The Defence submits the following into evidence:
  18. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. juniperfig [2025] DCR 10

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honour, I have recently been informed by a reputable source that you wish for me to carry out my sentence before you post the verdict to the forums. If this is true, I urge you to reconsider for the following...
  19. juniperfig

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    I respectfully request to amend the Answer to Complaint as follows: I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ... 7. The Defence DENIES AFFIRMS that on 15/02, Raitheguy07 opened a ticket with DHS hoping to revert his criminal record for these murders. The Plaintiff has submitted no proof of this occurring, and...
Back
Top