Search results

Apologies to @gribble19, I completely misread the witness requests. You are not required. Plaintiff, you may present your questions to your witness. You have 48 hours.

@gribble19, @End, @Angryhamdog, @1950Minecrafter, @Nacho, and @Staff Team are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31

As the Defence has had 150 hours to submit their opening statement, we will move to witnesses. Witness summons are to follow.

Defence, you have 24 hours to submit your cross-examination of the witness (lukeyyy11).

Granted.

You may!

As no witnesses have been requested, we will enter directly into closing statements. The Plaintiff has 72 hours to submit their closing statement.

Denied. The use of “fraud” is not vague, scandalous, or inadmissible. It’s a legal claim the Court has been asked to evaluate. While the Defendant is presumed innocent of any criminal wrongdoing, they are being sued on the basis of fraud, which the Plaintiff is entitled to argue. Alleging fraud...

You may, but the insult was unnecessary. Any future attacks on opposing counsel will have you held in contempt.

The Plaintiff has requested only punitive damages and legal fees. However, punitive damages are only available when authorized by statute or when the Defendant’s conduct is outrageous. In this case, both parties acknowledge that the auction was ended prematurely due to a miscommunication within...

Thank you all. Plaintiff, you have 24 hours to submit your questions for your witness (lukeyyy11).

Approved. This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice at the Plaintiff's request.

@lukeyyy11, @MasterAshim, and @Bardiya_King are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of RaiTheGuy v. lukeyyyMC_ [2025] FCR 30.

Overruled. Both statements can be true and intent was not proven. Witness summons will follow.

Overruled. The Plaintiff is permitted to call the Defence Counsel to testify strictly in their capacity as a legal representative of the Commonwealth. The Defence has 72 hours to submit their opening statement.

Denied.

You may.

Granted.

The Court has reviewed the Defence’s Motion to Reconsider, along with the response and earlier filings. The Defence argues that the case should have been dismissed because the Plaintiff didn’t notify the Department of State before filing the lawsuit. They cite [2021] SCR 16, a Supreme Court...

The Defendant has 72 hours to submit their opening statement.