Motion to dismiss denied
This case is looking at more then just the alleged illegal sentence that DocTheory recieve but also the commonwealth's duty to correct its wrong. Statue of Limitation begins counting when a violation/offense has completed especially when that violation/offense is...
Motion to Reconsider denied
The Emergency Injunction is in place to protect both sides from furthering the other harm in their process to protect depositors in case they are found to be the winning party. If the Commonwealth is found to be correct in their stance, The assets requested to be...
Motion to compel is slightly granted
The reach and expansiveness of this discovery request is absurd. Not only is most of what will be found from this request irrelevent to this case but a ton of it will be classified to some extent. Every discord besides the Judiciary is being requested to be...
Objection granted
The statement will be struck for being factually incorrect but as there seems to be no intent to purposely deceive the court, no one will be charged with perjury.
Objection Granted
As the evidence hadn't been struck yet, the commonwealth should have included it in their argument making. If the evidence were to be struck they can then amend their answer to complaint. The statement will be struck but no crime will be charged.
Motion to dismiss is denied.
For lack of claim, the assertion that the commonwealth did not break the law with nothing to back it besides the commonwealth's own words is not a valid reason to dismiss a case.
For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, the plaintiff was clearly impacted by the...
Motion to dismiss denied
The Supreme Court in the very case you quoted gave protections to organizations as they are ran by citizens and any actions against them affects citizens. As for your other points, they are defenses for the legality of the DOC's actions which is the major fact being...
Motion to dismiss is denied
The clear second party would be the commonwealth in this case, either damages caused in the jailing itself of the negligence in facilitating his release. Even if this was caused by a glitch, it does not remove the duty of the commonwealth to release him if informed.
Objection #1 Improper Evidence
Sustained, please split up the collage so each component can be address individually throughout this case.
Objection #2 Relevance
Sustained, Please provide both sides of the conversation.
Objection #3 Relevence,
Overruled, Juniperfig was clearly representing the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.