IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
zLost v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 52
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The plaintiff wishes the Federal court determine whether Oakridge election data is justly classified as allowed by the Classification Act.
2. If the Oakridge...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Vernicia v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 51
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. Due to the plaintiff owning a volt bank account the DOC's imposed bank holiday violates the plaintiffs 15th right for being an unreasonable seizure of assets...
I am dismissing this case Sua Sponte under rule 2.1 for lack of standing.
Standing requires three elements and this case has a glaring hole with the second requirement "The cause of injury was against the law." By the plaintiff's own facts, the comment in which caused the alleged damages was...
I am denying this motion in part.
This case is being moved to the Supreme Court as I do not have the authority or power to rule and decide cases involving the removal or banning of office. This case however is not being dismissed and only moved to the SC as to not waste this trial. I see no...
This case is being dismissed Sua Sponte for lack of a clear second party under Court rule 2.1
The court has come to the understanding when in search of a second party to summon (something that isn't the court's responsiblity to do), that the plaintiff, Cope Holdings, purchased Vanguard Martket...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31
I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Executive has failed in it's duties and Judicial intervention is required.
2. JSAA should be law as the president failed to give assent or veto in the required...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.