Search results

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The Defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed. GROUNDS On Friday 13th June, 7:39 PM (UTC+1), the Court was informed: "Justice Compass will no longer be representing Vanguard as their retainer has expired."...

Happy Birthday

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT The Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court to grant a Default Judgment against the Defendant, pursuant to the Court's inherent authority to enforce its orders and the principles underlying Rule 5.13 (Failure to...

Pursuant to Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntarily), the Plaintiff submits the following evidence: P-008. Operating Agreement of Vanguard Asset Management International, LLC P-009. Shareholder Agreement of Vanguard Asset Management International, LLC P-010. Articles of Incorporation of...

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff amends the Prayer for Relief section of the Complaint as follows: IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant: 1. Punitive damages in the amount of $50,000 per named Plaintiff (6 plaintiffs x $50,000 =...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT MrFluffy2U94 Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRMS, MrFluffy2U94 is a citizen of Redmont. 2. AFFIRMS, The Constitution guarantees that “Every citizen is equal before and under...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT The Prosecution moves that the Court enter a default judgment in this case, for the following reasons: 1. The Defendant, MC20masarati (aka "undatheradar"), was duly served with a Writ of Summons, requiring their...

TO OBJECTION The Plaintiff concedes the requirement for documents mentioned below.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CRIMINAL ACTION Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. MC20masarati (aka "undatheradar") Defendant COMPLAINT The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Commonwealth of Redmont 2...

May it please the court, I wish to file an Amicus brief regarding the Plaintiffs ability to file cases relating to Corporate and Administrative law, with respect to their currently held Barrister specializations.

May it please the court, I wish to file an Amicus brief regarding the Plaintiffs ability to file cases, with respect to their currently held legal qualifications.

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), if the court still sees us in the Discovery phase, the Plaintiff amends their complaint to modify the parties as follows: I. PARTIES 1. T04DS74 (aka ToadKing) (Plaintiff) 2. Vernicia (Plaintiff) 3. FTLCEO (Plaintiff) 4. lucaaasserole (aka Luca)...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honour, this case fundamentally revolves around two critical questions: 1. Was there a valid contract between the Defendant and Vanguard? 2. Did the Defendants' actions constitute fraud under the laws of Redmont? The...

BREACH OF PROCEDURE The Plaintiff objects to the Defendant's additional comments outside of their original Rule 4.7 opposition response. The Defendant has the right to comment on any additional information, but they should do so in the correct manner. The Plaintiff respectfully asks the court...

TO OPPOSITION The Plaintiff respectfully submits the following responses to Defendant's opposition to the additional discovery requests: 1. Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement) is a request for further documents. The Defendant appears to mistake this as a Rule 4.8...

Pursuant to Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Plaintiff requests the Defendant to produce the following additional materials relevant to the case: 1. Articles of Incorporation for Vanguard Securities LLC, showing its legal formation and corporate purpose. 2...

TO MOTION TO END DISCOVERY The Plaintiff respectfully opposes the Defendant's Motion to End Discovery for the following reasons: 1. The Defendant's vague admission that user numbers and transactions were "significantly large numbers" is deliberately imprecise and insufficient for the Court to...