Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL The Plaintiff moves that the Court compel the Defendant to produce the documents requested, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. Privacy Act Section 4(1) establishes "Accessibility to your own private information"...

OBJECTION - ASKED AND ANSWERED Your Honour, the Plaintiff has already answered these document requests, and it appears the Defence is trying to skirt around this answer by amending their requests without any substantive changes.

As previously stated, I invoke my right under PART IV Section (32)(5) of the Constitution to not produce self-incriminating evidence.

The witness list will remain as: 1. Juniperfig 2. Gribble19 I invoke my right under PART IV Section (32)(5) of the Constitution. Updated questions: 1. How would the Plaintiff's continued employment have been "a detriment to the workflow and reputation of the Department of Justice"? 2. Why is...

The employees listed were employed at the same time as the Plaintiff. Whilst not all may have directly worked with the Plaintiff, they may have seen his work and can speak to his performance and character.

As has been rightfully pointed out, this document request was perhaps overly excessive. Pursuant to Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Plaintiff updates the initial discovery request and asks the Defendant to produce the following materials relevant to the case: 1...

All requested messages are protected by Attorney-Client Privilege, as defined in Section (8)(4) Modern Legal Reform Act, as they may have occurred between Plaintiff and clients in private Discord DMs, MZLD retainer channels, and consultation tickets. These communications are legally privileged...

TO OBJECTION All listed witnesses are DOJ employees who worked with Plaintiff during his employment period and can provide relevant testimony about his work performance and character. The Defendant has specifically DENIED in their Answer (8) that Plaintiff's legal work was "exemplary", making...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR CLOSED COURT SESSION Your Honor, The Plaintiff is requesting a Closed Court Session on the basis that certain evidence relevant to this case is classified to a CABINET level, specifically relating to the Discord server titled...

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff amends the Complaint as follows: II. FACTS 12. On 29th June, 2025, Plaintiff was paid $10,000 by the Department of Justice for duties performed during June 2025, representing Plaintiff's monthly salary and bonuses for completed cases...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The Defendant respectfully moves this Court to reconsider its denial of the Motion to Dismiss, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. When a player makes a buy-in in poker, that money becomes part of the pot...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE The Plaintiff's Motion to Compel violates this Court's order that "Discovery is temporarily postponed until further notice." Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement) requests cannot be made...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Maxib02 Plaintiff v. DocTheory Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. Defendant AFFIRMS that the Plaintiff participated in a poker game with the Defendant on Pokernow.club on June 29-30. 2. Defendant AFFIRMS that the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT Per the summons: "Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case." The Defendant has had 240 hours to make themselves known to the court...

Firm Name ToadLaw LLC Which grant pool are you applying for? Innovation, Startup, Research and Development (R&D) How do you plan on using your grant funding? ToadLaw LLC will use the grant funding to pay qualified legal professionals and educational content developers to create comprehensive...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION T04DS74 (aka ToadKing) Plaintiff v. Gribble19 Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. T04DS74 2. Gribble19 II. FACTS 1. At all relevant times, Plaintiff was employed as a...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion to Recuse I submit this motion in good faith. The Plaintiff respectfully requests that Your Honour recuse themselves from this case due to a prolonged absence. If Your Honour is unable to continue with this case in a meaningful...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION T04DS74 (aka ToadKing) Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. T04DS74 2. Gribble19 (Attorney General) 3. Commonwealth of Redmont II...