Search results

  1. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters v. Nexalin [2025] FCR 36

    Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff amends the Prayer for Relief section of the Complaint as follows: IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant: 1. Punitive damages in the amount of $50,000 per named Plaintiff (6 plaintiffs x $50,000 =...
  2. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters v. Nexalin [2025] FCR 36

    Your Honour, I will be unable to provide an answer in the time required. I humbly request a 24-hour extension so I can finish writing a response to your questions.
  3. ToadKing

    Bill: Draft Conflict of Interest Standards Act

    A BILL To Establish Standards for Conflicts of Interest in Government and Judicial Appointments. The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby...
  4. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court to reconsider its denial of our perjury objection based on a fundamental error of law. GROUNDS: 1. The Court denied our objection stating "Only the DoJ can charge...
  5. ToadKing

    Rescinded Allegiance Act

    A BILL To To Protect the State from Foreign Interference The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law: 1...
  6. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your Honour, The Defendant states in their Answer to Complaint: However, the Attorney General has previously stated openly and publicly: "why would you ever join GER rather than WPR besides for like star wars or being...
  7. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honour, the DCT Secretary continues to speak out of turn. We request that the court strike his comment from the record and hold him in contempt of court. This court previously stated, "[End cannot] continue...
  8. ToadKing

    Bill: Draft Judicial Accountability for Inactivity Act

    A BILL To Amend the Constitution The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following provisions into law: 1 - Short Title and...
  9. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, using the Defendant's previous argument: In Munkler v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 42, #3 the plaintiff's counsel argued that: "An amicus brief is a legal document submitted to a court by...
  10. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters v. Nexalin [2025] FCR 36

    1. As established in Cope Holdings v Vanguard Market Access [2025] FCR 62, VMA was created using the /db command system and was owned in-game by Nexalin under the business "VMA" (P-013). This demonstrates direct personal ownership and operation by Nexalin as an individual. 2. Under Business...
  11. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters v. Nexalin [2025] FCR 36

    Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff amends the Complaint as follows: Privacy Matters Collective (Class Action Group Represented by Mezimori) Plaintiff v. Vanguard Securities LLC  Nexalin Defendant This amendment is made to reflect the fact that "Vanguard Securities...
  12. ToadKing

    Rescinded Economic Redemption Act

    A BILL To Facilitate the Creation of a State-Owned Withdrawal Facility and Ease the Economy After the Financial Collapse The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the...
  13. ToadKing

    Rescinded Conflict of Interest Standards Act

    A BILL To Establish Standards for Conflicts of Interest in Government and Judicial Appointments. The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby...
  14. ToadKing

    Act of Congress Text Me Back Act

    For recording reasons, the vote tally was 11-0-0 (House) and 4-0-1 (Senate) before the revote. Revote records: HOR: 5-2-0 ; Senate: 4-0-0 A BILL To Amend the Text Me Back Act The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law...
  15. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed T04DS74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI The Plaintiff wishes to drop this lawsuit after reaching an out-of-court agreement with the Defendant.
  16. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed T04DS74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

    Plaintiff requests to amend their response, as this now changes the Motion to Dismiss.
  17. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed T04DS74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

    TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honour, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be DENIED. GROUNDS: 1. Contrary to Defendant's false assertion that "Plaintiff has not opposed any of these six requests, nor did Plaintiff respond to any of these six requests," Plaintiff...
  18. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed T04DS74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

    The Plaintiff requests a response to this motion.
  19. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed T04DS74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

    OBJECTION - NON-RESPONSIVE Your Honour, the Plaintiff specifically requested "Any CABINET classified discussions about Plaintiff's termination and any other classified or confidential communications about firing Plaintiff.". This response fails to answer the discovery request. Pursuant to Rule...
Back
Top