Search results

  1. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Your Honor, We would like to enter the following list of individuals to be our witnesses. 1. Yeet_Boy (Plaintiff) 2. TheSuperior (Inspection Manager in the DCT)
  2. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    Your Honor, We want to enter the following into evidence.
  3. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION BoopingBerry (Nacholebraa representing) Plaintiff v. Town of Oakridge Defendant COMPLAINT On 6/11/24, BoopingBerry, my client, received a notification from the Mayor of Oakridge, Yeet_Boy, informing her that the DCT would...
  4. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Adjourned BoopingBerry v. Town of Oakridge [2024] FCR 88

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT EMERGENCY INJUNCTION We request the court to freeze the plot mentioned below from being sold or held by the government in any capacity and restrict the commonwealth's ability to evict future plots in the same manner. Emergency injunctions are...
  5. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Yes, your honor, that is correct. I did not realize you were asking a clarifying question.
  6. Nacho

    Accepted Nacho - Billboard Application

    Username Nacholebraa What type of billboard are you applying for? Private Billboard Have you marked out the billboard area for the staff member placing the billboard at the above coordinates? Yes Coordinates of Billboard C005 Imgur link to billboard image
  7. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, We didn't submit the witnesses because we didn't need them, so there is nothing to strike. We did not submit the witness out of care and consideration for the Plaintiff, who we knew would just complain the whole time about it.
  8. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, I had not seen your message and rushed to get this put together and finalized, as I didn't wish to be late for a response.
  9. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    OPENING STATEMENTS Your Honor, In this case, the plaintiff presented a narrative suggesting their dismissal was unfair, primarily due to a lack of communication and vague reasoning. However, the facts paint a different picture. The plaintiff claims they were dismissed without a clear...
  10. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, The state will have to request a 12-hour extension due to scheduling conflicts with personal matters happening IRL.
  11. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Objection - Breach of Procedure Your Honor, We believe the previous Presiding Judge's extension to the Plaintiff has come and gone. The state would like to request that we skip the Plaintiff's opening statement and move on to our opening statement. This is a clear-cut disregard for the...
  12. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, The state would like to request clarification as to where we are at within the case. Currently I am of the understanding that the Plaintiff has missed their deadline extension given by the previous presiding officer. However, did not note a formal notice for us to present our...
  13. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, The Plaintiff is attempting to regain their case, which is commendable. However, they just displayed within their thread that they don't recognize the authority of the chair of the case. They demonstrated they intend to bash and ignore the...
  14. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The Commonwealth of Redmont moves to dismiss this case under Rule 5.5 for lack of a claim. Your Honor, the plaintiff lists one claim for relief, which is unfair dismissal, but fails to provide any substantial facts...
  15. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Hey, hi, it's me from the State! o/ I wanted to slide into this discussion as well. While it's entertaining to watch the Plaintiff attempt to argue with the presiding Judge, the State has an opinion on the matter. The Plaintiff is attempting to compare the internal...
  16. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, Let's face the facts, regardless of whether the entire legal community ignores something. The rights awarded to us by the Constitution are outlined as a fair and speedy trial. While the Plaintiff might think the Commonwealth has no rights, we argue that we very much do have the...
  17. Nacho

    Election Presidential Elections - JUNE 2024

    I, Nacholebraa declare that I will be contesting the Office of President. My Vice Presidential running mate will be xEndeavor. I will be running as an independent.
  18. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Your Honor, I get out of work at 9:30 tonight. I request an additional 2 hours to provide a response to the motion to reconsider. I will be prompt in my response if you allow me.
  19. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Objections - Perjury Your Honor, The Plaintiff has frivolously filed this case. Citing that they were never given a reason for their dismissal from the building inspector, The Plaintiff has perjured and has attempted to misguide the court into thinking the Commonwealth has dismissed the...
  20. Nacho

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ko531 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 70

    Motion To Reconsider Your Honor, The State requests that you reconsider your verdict on our motion to strike. Court rule (Rule 4.6 - Submission of Discovery, Voluntarily) is relatively simple. The plaintiff is a practicing attorney, and they understand and know what they are doing. They...
Back
Top