Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS royalsnakee Plaintiff V IIKermitII Defendant 1) 5.12: Opposing counsel doesn’t have a very significant standing, as when looking at the attached file, he is clearly suing to take my client's money. Opposing counsel...

The definition of perjury in the objection guide states "When a witness has perjured themselves on the stand by lying or strongly misrepresenting facts on the stand (proof of perjury should be made with the objection)." Once again, we have not reached witness testimony yet. The definition of...

I do not agree to this.

I meant to reply to the objection on speculation and badgering.

The definition of speculation is "When a witness is asked to testify about something they have not directly observed. Witnesses are only allowed to testify about their own direct experiences and thoughts." We haven't reached testimony yet, and therefore this objection isn't relevant to my...

Opposing council hasn't presented proof of this.

You honor, I seem to have made a mistake. Under defense 2, I meant to say "DLA ticket," not "DOJ ticket." Permission to change this, and only this.

I will be representing IIKermitII your honor.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT royalsnakee Plaintiff V IIKermitII Defendant ANSWER TO COMPLAINT The defense disputes fact one because although both parties were guilty of harming one another, there is no proof to show my client started it The...

May I add one more thing your honor?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT AMICUS BRIEF royalsnakee Plaintiff V Commonwealth of Redmont Plaintiff 1) Being part of the DOJ, I can confirm that our officers make their best efforts to arrest wanted criminals (because I have been on for the majority...

AMICUS BRIEF Your honor, being part of the DOJ and noticing something in one of the screenshots, I request to file an Amicus Brief.

The picture attached to this message shows proof of representation

Moondrowloo

Your honor, I seem to have made a mistake in the title, as I said "IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT." I meant to say "IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT." May I make that change?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION 4DCube (Represented by Dragon Law) Plaintiff V AnArab COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the defendants as follows: On February 8th, 2024, my client was murdered by AnArab. This, in itself, was bad enough, however...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION ANDREASP15 (Represented by Dragon Law) Plaintiff V The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The plaintiff complains against the defendant as follows: On February 11th, 2024, my client made an $8,500 bid to the c718...

856

I don't have definitive proof, however, we may get insight from witness testimony.

The crime was committed over 30 days ago. Exhibit A shows the active 30-day playtime that my client had accrued. If the crime was committed over 30 days ago, and my client's 30-day playtime was 7 hours (above 5 hours), then he had been on for 5 hours after the crime was committed. The...