Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL Your Honor, the Defendant respectfully requests the court compel the Plaintiff to respond to both Discovery Requests submitted by the Defendant. The Plaintiff has not clearly responded to the six separate requests made in the...

11. The Defendant agrees to this request. The Defendant to the best of their ability has no unclassified documents to submit in response to this request.

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, the Defendant is aware of the specifics of the request. The response does not fail to answer the discovery request, as the Defendant has, to the best of their ability, provided all unclassified documents that have been requested, since Defendant is not aware of...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, it appears the Plaintiff misread the request. The Defendant is requesting something entirely different. Rather than requesting the messages, the Defendant is requesting a list of names of people who were at any point able to see any such messages which are known...

Pursuant to Rule 4.7, the Defendant requests the Plaintiff to produce the following materials relevant to the case: A list of all people that would at any point in time have been able to access, view or read: Any and all messages sent by the Plaintiff, during or after Plaintiff's employment at...

Pursuant to Rule 4.9 (Witness Protocol), the Defendant submits the following witness list: 1. T04DS74

1. The Defendant opposes this request. This request includes information that is confidential (Privacy Act, §6) and sharing the information in the public domain would cause the Commonwealth to be liable to fines (Privacy Act, §7). 2. The Defendant agrees to this request. The Defendant to the...

Pursuant to Rule 3.4 (Amendment to Answer), the Defendant amends their Answer to Complaint as follows, in response to Plaintiff's amendments to their Complaint: I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 18. The Defendant AFFIRMS that Plaintiff was told on July 1st 2025 that "You seriously breached department...

1. Considering the severity of the policy violation that occurred, Plaintiff's continued employment would have been a detriment to the reputation of the Department of Justice as it would reflect badly on the Department of Justice, that consistently deals with classified and confidential...

Pursuant to Rule 4.8 (Interrogatories), the Defendant submits the following request for interrogatory: 1. For how many of the 35 minutes for which the Plaintiff was detained was the Plaintiff logged on?

The Defendant respectfully requests an extension of Discovery. 24 hours is an extremely short time for Discovery and does not even allow for Interrogatories, as requests for interrogatories must be filed 72 hours before the end of Discovery (Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 4.8).

Your Honor, the Defendant respectfully requests an extension to the deadline for answering the interrogatories, until 24 hours after all pending objections to those interrogatories have been ruled on.

No.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE Your Honor, this request assumes that there exists a specific legal authority, DOJ policy or established precedent that places the burden on a terminated employee to "reach out privately" or "open a...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, these are not questions, they are orders. The purpose of interrogatories is to ask specific questions to the other party, not to order them around. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF...

Pursuant to Rule 4.7, the Defendant requests the Plaintiff to produce the following materials relevant to the case: Any and all messages sent by the Plaintiff, during or after Plaintiff's employment at the Department of Justice and sent anywhere other than in the Department of Justice discord...

The Defendant enters the following evidence, pursuant to Rule 4.6:

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, looking at what the Plaintiff has explained in their response to the motion more in-depth, it is clear that the total value of the case does not exceed $50,000. They have multiplied the value of the case by 1.3...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT T04DS74 Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defendant AFFIRMS that Plaintiff was hired as a State Prosecutor by then Attorney General, Juniperfig, on May 16 2025. 2. The Defendant...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The Defendant moves the Complaint in this case be dismissed pursuant to Rule 5.4 of our Court Rules and Procedures. A Motion to Dismiss may be filed against an incorrectly filed case if another court should have original...