Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Plaintiff has failed to provide the means to contact the witnesses in the alloted time.

Your Honor, this is blatantly false. The defense themselves provided the evidence to support these facts. If I might draw your attention to P-003, where the plaintiff clearly asks IAmJeb_: "... did you give me conset [sic] to take the bounty off you some time ago?" This very clearly shows why...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor. Ladies, gentlemen, enbies and others, plaintiff’s counsel has attempted to weave a narrative of a good cop crushed under the boot of a corrupt system. Reality has something to say on the matter. On the...

Your Honor, I'm respectfully requesting a 24 hour extension due to mental health issues. I apologize for the trouble.

Your Honor, I'm pleased to announce that both parties have agreed on an out of court settlement.

Breach of Procedure Defendant is talking out of turn. Motions require permission to respond to.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, the Plaintiff respectfully requests you to reconsider this decision of clarifying the precedent. Looking at the description of Improper Evidence as stated in this court's guide to objections, we read: "Refers...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - Improper Evidence Your Honor, all exhibits presented by the defendant are cropped and exclude context. In addition, D-004, D-005, D-007, D-008, D-009, D-010, and D-011 have been modified with a marker. Precedent from FCR 102 [...

Witness List: 1. End

Your Honor, does the original timeline for Discovery still apply?

BREACH OF PROCEDURE Per Rule 4.8, Plaintiff and Defendant may ask up to 5 relevant questions while within discovery to each other... The Defendant has asked his five questions. He can't ask anymore.

2. Issues with Discord relating to firing people at the time. 3. My client no longer has access to DCT. Any answer would be speculation.

Non-Responsive End didn't answer the question, again. I asked if p-003 was the form used to submit articles to Politico, not if it was anonymous.

4. There was no one to fire. I'm reaching out to my client regarding Questions 2 and 3. Your Honor, in order to ensure we have the full picture (and due to pressing IRL matters), I'd like to request a 24 hour extension to respond to the remainder of the defendant's interrogatories.

Submitting p-003 into evidence. INTERROGATORY: 2. Can you confirm that p-003 is the anonymous submission form used by Politico?

INTERROGATORY: 1. Who is the author of the article showcased in p-002? Further questions may follow depending on defendant's response.

Your Honor, I'll be submitting p-001 and p-002 into evidence. Also attached is proof of representation.

I move to submit p-004, p-005, p-006, p-007, and p-008 into evidence. Furthermore Your Honor, I wish to amend the Complaint to remove the Breach of Contract from the Claims for Relief/Prayer for Relief.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE, PERJURY Your Honor, everything written below the linked court case is irrelevant. It is neither evidence nor an interrogatory, and I move that it be struck. More pressingly however, Your Honor, there is a...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE This has absolutely nothing to do with the case at hand, and appears to be nothing more than an attempt to smear the plaintiff. I Motion to Strike the question.