Search results

  1. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    Please provide this proof.
  2. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    We will now be entering discovery. Discovery will last 5 days starting now.
  3. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Multiman155 v. Cahania [2025] DCR 34

    You may. You have 24 hours to submit your brief.
  4. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Multiman155 v. Cahania [2025] DCR 34

    Denied. To be clear, I am not outright denying the possibility of a Trial by Combat. If this is your wish then we might still find a means of allowing such a possibility, hinging on the defendant’s consent. What I will not be entertaining in the slightest is your demands to turn this legal...
  5. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    As TheGreat_Boi has now provided proof of representation, this motion is denied. I am giving the defendant 24 hours from the time of this post to provide their Answer to Complaint.
  6. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    @TheGreat_Boi Please provide proof of representation. Defendant's deadline to post an answer to complaint is paused until further notice.
  7. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Multiman155 v. Cahania [2025] DCR 34

    Per the honorable Chief Justice Aladeen's ruling in Multiman155 v. Cahania [2025] DCR 34 - Appeal, this case will continue once more. As Justice Ameslap now sits on the Federal Court, I will be requesting a new public defender.
  8. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    You have 72 hours from the time of this post to file an Answer to Complaint.
  9. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    @qsdt is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38.
  10. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Your Honor, for the sake of avoiding prolonged testimony, the defense will be retracting question 3 entirely. We retain the right to ask additional questions dependant on the plaintiff's answers.
  11. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Response to Objection Your Honor, Oxford Languages defines context as "the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood". Plaintiff's counsel is attempting to muddy the waters and attempt to make our simple question more...
  12. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Response to Objection Your Honor, as you are no doubt aware, more direct questioning is allowed on cross-examination. Regardless, this objection, as plaintiff's counsel is fond of saying, is entirely without merit. The question “In D-005, D-003, and D-002, you make several mentions that your...
  13. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Response to Objection Your Honor, you'll note I prefaced the question with "to the best of your knowledge". Regardless, it is absolutely reasonable to assume plaintiff has some idea as to what his counsel shared amongst one another. Furthermore, this inquiry does not risk breaching...
  14. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    @DocsTheory 1. How much in-game playtime did you spend in prison? 2. At any point during your incarceration did you escape from prison? 3. In D-009, you are quoted as saying "can lie dont care if the jailtime is longer". Can you provide context to this statement? 4. In D-005, D-003, and D-002...
  15. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Your Honor, as plaintiff's counsel has said they have no further questions for plaintiff, and as the Staff Team has recused themselves, may we question the plaintiff?
  16. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. MC20masarati [2025] FCR 57

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT The Prosecution moves that the Court enter a default judgment in this case, for the following reasons: 1. The Defendant is permanently deported, and thus lacks the right to contest this case. 2. The Prosecution...
  17. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. MC20masarati [2025] FCR 57

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: Mc20Masarati has been permanently deported. Under Rule 2.1, plaintiff must have standing in order to pursue a...
  18. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Arguing with the Witness Your Honor, I don't typically like to Object to responses, but this is getting ridiculous. In a response to an Objection where I accused plaintiff's counsel of badgering the witness, their defense was to attack the witness once again. Please note the following passage...
  19. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Breach of Procedure Your Honor, plaintiff's counsel edited their response AFTER posting it, adding signifcant material to their response, without informing this court. Per precedent from FCR 66%27...
  20. AmityBlamity

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Breach of Procedure The time to call witnesses has come and gone. Plaintiff's counsel had plenty of time to call Interception as a witness, and chose not to.
Back
Top