IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security - [2025] FCR 21
Civil Action
I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
The Plaintiff was terminated unjustly by the department.
This termination did not follow department policy, thus it was unjust under...
Perfect. We will now move to closing statements.
The Plaintiff has 72 hours to post their closing statements. Once the statement is posted or 72 hours has passed the Defense shall have 72 hours to post their closing statement.
Thank you all for your patience.
Hello all, I have taken over as the presiding officer for this case.
I see that we have done examination of a single witness but have not yet begun on the other 2 is this correct @Dogeington and @Dartanboy?
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Following careful deliberation, the Federal Court has decided to deny this appeal.
On the points brought up:
The District court ruled "no witness or other evidence was submitted to support the humiliating aspect." This court agrees that a...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
The Federal Court has decided to accept this appeal.
The court awards legal fees in the amount of $2,000 to the Defendant. The remaining verdict from the lower court shall stay in effect.
Thank you for your patience.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
Your honor, rule 5.2 stats that "A Motion to Dismiss must be submitted at any time before the beginning of opening statements."
Not only are opening statements well behind us, but the court is in recess with...
- Username: Ameslap
- What are your strengths and weaknesses?:
Strengths
Organized;
Responsive;
Well versed in law;
Able to communicate effectively.
Weaknesses:
Limited cases;
Could work on my writing more.
- What town/city do you primarily reside in?: Aventura
- Why do you want this...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
Your Honor,
The Defense in their opening statement claims that bribery has not been properly established, however the Prosecution would like to argue that bribery itself does not have to be proven in this case. The...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
Your honor, this may be the most open and shut case in all of Redmontian legal history.
The Defendant hoped to turn the tide of an election. On three separate occasions, the Accused posted publicly and as an ad “Vote Zlost...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
Your honor, opposing counsel has argued that because the term "answer" and "plea" are different then the rules do not apply. Firstly, this is a dangerous precedent to set as there is no distinction in any place on when to...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEEDURE
Rule 3.2 states:
All answers, even Small Claims, must use the appropriate “Creating a Lawsuit” format and must have:
An affirmation of what facts are affirmed, denied, or non contested.
Either defenses under...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.