Search results

  1. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    You may within the next 24 hours. Discovery shall end 72 hours after my ruling on the objection and motion. Furthermore, one of my goals as judge is to offer more in-game trials. Both parties are to respond by the end of discovery on if they would like an in-game trial or not.
  2. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session MysticPhunky v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 71

    The Defense has 48 hours to submit their answer.
  3. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    I will overrule this objection on the basis that businesses/organizations have been found to be able to have beneficial ownership rather than de jure ownership. I will say that the Plaintiff needs to list all properties that are beneficially owned by the Galactic Empire of Redmont not just...
  4. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session MysticPhunky v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 71

    @gribble19 or their representative is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of MysticPhunky v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] - FCR 71
  5. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    After reviewing the information, I have decided to sustain this objection. I want to make this clear: End is not a direct party to this case as the DCT is the Defendant and by extension the Government itself. As such the DOJ is the only body that may represent government agencies (unless...
  6. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    Cool! Go ahead and edit your original complaint to match the changes.
  7. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    I will wait the 24 hours to see if there is a response by the Defendant prior to fully ruling on this objection just as I did prior. End (I won’t @ you but please make yourself aware), you are not to post the brief until this objection is resolved.
  8. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    I’ll allow it under the same condition that either party may motion to strike or object based on relevance once the brief is submitted Please provide your brief in the next 24 hours.
  9. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    Based on the testimony given by Plaintiff's counsel, I will not charge counsel with Perjury, but this is a warning that any future mistakes will be considered intentional and will be handled as perjury I will wait to fully rule on the relevance until discovery is over and request that the...
  10. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    I want to give everyone a timeline for how I will be handling this. I am able to be online and checking this case on a rotating basis throughout the day, and I understand that this is not a luxury afforded to everyone. I have read all of the objections and the request for a new amicus brief...
  11. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    Sustained. As a member of the GER you are a direct party to this case and as such cannot file a amicus brief.
  12. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    Motion Denied. Once the report was filed the law has officially been applied to the Plaintiff. Additionally, in both cases that the Plaintiff cited in their complaint, it shows that the reports alone are enough for standing. The Defendant has 48 to file a response to the complaint.
  13. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    I will be granting the Emergency Injunction. The purpose of an EI is to prevent harm, and by following through with an eviction, selling, and potential demolition of 4 buildings could be harmful in the event that the Plaintiff is found to be victorious in this case. The Government is hereby...
  14. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IamJeb_ v. pourpup [2025] DCR 44

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT IamJeb_ v. Pourpup- [2025] DCR 44 Civil Action I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION The Defendant was harrassing the Plaintiff. II. DEFENDANT’S POSITION Did not respond. III. THE COURT’S OPINION This case is moved to Default Judgement. The...
  15. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and transportation [2025] FCR 69

    This is a warning to not speak in court until summoned, that being said, you may respond to the EI within the next 24 hours. @gribble19 or their representative is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of construction and...
  16. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IamJeb_ v. pourpup [2025] DCR 44

    @pourpup is required to appear before the District Court in the case of IamJeb_ v. pourppup.
  17. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Plura72 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 69

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT DISMISSAL I will be granting the dismissal per Nolle Prosequi. It is great to hear that the parties have settled their differences, however, this is suggestion to the Plaintiff or any other person: Before filing a case against the...
  18. ameslap

    Who's that Pokémon

    Day 3 is coming for you! Whose that Pokemon?
  19. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT RylandW v. v__d - [2025] FCR 37 Civil Action I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION The Defendant made multiple defamatory statements about the Plaintiff. Due to this the Plaintiff lost the Mayor election and; The Plaintiff suffered reputational...
  20. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    With that, we are finally in recess pending a verdict.
Back
Top