It seems that a portion of the money withheld from Plaintiff was originally their own. That fact does raise concerns related to these statutes. You may continue to develop your interpretative arguments, but the Motion to Dismiss is denied.
Discovery shall now begin and will be set to end 72...
A question for either party: was a portion of the total amount a buy-in from Plaintiff, as suggested in P-003, or did Plaintiff start the game with none of their own money?
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Commonwealth of Redmont v. Plura72 [2025] DCR 39
VERDICT
The facts are given in the opinion.
I. OPINION
Defendant spoke out of turn in End v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 39, making multiple claims: 1.) the plaintiff of that case was...
Given the time already elapsed and the lack of any admissions during Discovery, I'll be allotting shorter times for statements to adhere to the spirit of a speedy trial.
Plaintiff has 48 hours from the time of this post to file an Opening Statement.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Munkler v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 42
ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF NOLLE PROSEQUI
This case is dismissed at the request of Plaintiff. Both the previously issued Subpoena and Order to Compel are rescinded.
The District Court thanks all...
CONTEMPT OF COURT
The Department of Justice is charged with Contempt of Court and sentenced with the maximum fine of $5,000 for failing to adhere to the previously issued warning pertaining to deadlines.
The Department of Justice shall now have the same deadline as Plaintiff to provide the...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Munkler v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 42
ORDER TO COMPEL
I. TICKETS
Both the Plaintiff and the Defendant are ordered to provide any and all information related to any tickets created by the Plaintiff with the Commonwealth related to...
These points are noted, but they don't invalidate the entire Complaint. Motion denied.
Since it was likely an oversight, the Court won't classify it as ignoring the warning. Motion denied.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
SomethingSage v. WackJap [2025] DCR 46
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
At the request of the Plaintiff, this case is dismissed without prejudice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.