Search results

The Supreme Court denies the appeal. We find no error in the Federal Court's verdict. The Commonwealth failed to appear despite being properly summoned, and it was within the authority of the Federal Court to issue a default ruling based on the known facts of the case.

The motion for summary judgement is granted. This case is now in recess pending verdict.

You have 48 hours to present your Answer to Complaint

The Supreme Court of Redmont will be granting a modified Emergency Injunction. Secretary xDarkkex is temporarily restrained from changing any policy within the Department of Public Affairs for the duration of the case or until further orders of this Court. This will not prevent any day-to-day...

@Attorney General's Office is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of zLost v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 10.

The appeal is hereby granted, and the case is remanded to the District Court. This Court finds that there were errors in the dismissal of the case, specifically in how the alleged defamation and the claim regarding loss of enjoyment were assessed. These are issues that must be properly reviewed...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The prosecution argues that the defendant commited bribery by offering $10,000 to any citizen who voted for a specific candidate during the Oakridge mayoral election. 2. The Prosecution stated that this...

In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to do a Summary Judgement in favor of the plaintiff due to the defendant being banned from the server. We apologize for the extreme tardiness as I have personally have gone through IRL long term issues.

In a 3-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to reject the appeal. We believe that the original verdict was supported by clear evidence and legal reasoning. We will not tolerate the way in which the judge from the original case has been treated in this appeal. The Supreme Court thanks...

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to reject the appeal. The dismissal of the case correctly concluded that the plaintiff failed to establish a legal basis for relief. Punitive damages need to be plead correctly in the claims for relief establishing what facts lead to "outrageous"...

In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to reject this appeal. You cannot speak on an active court post without explicit permission from the Judicial Officers. Obstructing court proceedings does qualify as contempt and you did that more than once. We find that it is justified to uphold...

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to reject the appeal. We find no error in the dismissal of the case, the appeal has continued to fail to establish any standing.

In a 3-0 decision the Supreme Court accepts the Plea Deal and asks the DHS to carry out the punishments listed.

24 hours granted.

Given it is now Monday and neither sides have posted anything we will move on. Prosecution has 72 hours to post they’re opening statement.

The emergency injunction is declined.

After a 2-0 vote the Supreme Court has voted to accept the appeal and reverse the original verdict. The plaintiff may refile the case in the Supreme Court. The original verdict will not be enforced pending the outcome of the retrial.

The appeal is denied due to the plaintiff failing to demonstrate solid harm resulted from the President's actions. The original verdict found no proof of financial loss or any constitutional violations. This appeal presents no new facts to justify a reconsideration.

The Supreme Court declines to hear this case. Given other errors in the federal case, not getting emotional damages is harmless. We see no need to do anything with the Judge's decision.

In a 2-0 decision the Supreme Court has decided to reject this appeal for the following reason. We have found no merit to overturn the decision made by Justice Matthew, the verdict correctly held that the defendant did not have enough legal capacity due to their playtime and lack of financial...