Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honor, clearly this case is not a big deal to the Commonwealth, or they wouldn't be on day 4 out of 2 to respond to 3 questions. Furthermore, the Court rules are clear, stating that answers  must be given in time...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT The Court Rules clearly dictate: (Rule 4.8) and (Rule 5.13) The equivalent to a Dismissal on the Plaintiff's side is a Default Judgement. As it has been More than 80 hours since interrogatories were asked, it is...

INTERROGATORY The following interrogatory is submitted for the Commonwealth to respond to: 1. What evidence did the Commonwealth have that there was a financial crisis or other major problem that necessitated the seizure of Vanguard's banks? 2. Why didn't the Commonwealth serve Vanguard a...

Speculation Witness is testifying about other people's thoughts

BREACH OF PROCEDURE After Closing Statements is no time for an Amicus Brief,  further delaying the trial of my client.

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT Naezaratheus has been permanently deported. We request Default Judgement.

Narrative | Nothing Pending The witness has elaborated much further than the question asked about.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Vanguard requests a slight modification to this ruling, which we believe further prevents harm. Vanguard seeks permission to, of its own power and accord, liquidate some of its assets in preparation for the nearly...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS ON THE FIRST POINT The Defense's counsel appears to be deliberately misrepresenting both the arguments made by the Plaintiff as well as the precedent they have cited. The Defense first alleges Lack of Standing...

PERJURY This quote is literally not found in that lawsuit. In fact, the words "person" and "personhood" are nowhere to be seen in it.

May we respond to the Motion to Dismiss, your Honor?

Juniperfig is the Attorney General, and represents the Commonwealth, including the DoC, in all legal matters. Is the DoJ actually arguing that the Attorney General was not acting on her official capacity in Vanguard's conversations in a DoC ticket?

We are happy to provide additional evidence. Lack of additional evidence doesn't make this irrelevant.

The images are not doctored. It is a collage of multiple images.

China

Consent to Represent: (Justice Compass is representing Vanguard. This includes Dartanboy, Ibney0, Ethamn, and Ameslap)

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION The Department of Commerce has illegally seized Vanguard's assets, alleging illiquidity and an inability to pay back depositors. They immediately began attempting to forcibly liquidate assets and attempted to...

MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI We have decided to pursue an alternative route, however, if it goes under we would like to pursue legal action again. We ask the case be dismissed without prejudice.

MOTION TO RECONSIDER Court Rules dictate it is 12 hours (Guide - Court Orders) and that's what we were going off of. Although, the JSA does supercede court policy, so please consider this a refiling of the Motion for an Emergency Injunction, essentially creating a new 4-hour timer.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR MERGENCY INJUNCTION The DoC has seized Vanguard National Bank and Discover Bank, without providing: Proof of illiquidity of the banks Proof of any crime Proof of misrepresented financial statements And without receiving: A...