Search results

  1. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    MOTION TO DISMISS Your honor, Long-standing precedent in all three courts dictates that when a Plaintiff fails to pursue the case, it is dismissed. See [2021] DCR 69 - Lawsuit: Dismissed - lawanoesepr v. Admin23 [2021] DCR 69 [2022] FCR 89 - Lawsuit: Dismissed - Matthew100x & xLayzur v. The...
  2. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    (I was able to finish over lunch - sorry for asking for the unneeded extension) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your honor, This case is nothing but a cash-grab... an attempt to take money from my client for using his constitutional right to political...
  3. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    Your honor, May I be permitted a 1 hour extension as I will be just getting off work at the current deadline.
  4. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    MOTION TO DISMISS "NotADoctor9218" is not the Plaintiff. "Doc" is. As the person in this screenshot does not have the same name as the Plaintiff, this case should be dismissed without prejudice until such time as it is filed on behalf of the actual Plaintiff, or the actual Plaintiff appears.
  5. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Doc Plaintiff v. qsdt Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRM The plaintiff, Doc, was offered 5k Redmont Dollars in order to kill the defendant, qsdt. 2. AFFIRM the Plaintiff rejected the offer. 3. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR...
  6. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Pending Doc v. qsdt [2025] DCR 38

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS TheGreat_Boi has not provided proof of representation, making the initial case filing invalid. This case should be dismissed without prejudice.
  7. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    I have no further questions
  8. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RylandW v. v__d [2025] FCR 37

    No more questions, your honor.
  9. Dartanboy

    Appeal: Denied [2025] FCR 58 - Appeal

    MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION We ask that while this appeal is pending, "realtor-only" auctions be frozen, as allowing them to continue will cause irreversible harm by permanently making the plots my client wishes to bid on unavailable to him.
  10. Dartanboy

    Appeal: Denied [2025] FCR 58 - Appeal

    The New Evidence Mentioned
  11. Dartanboy

    Appeal: Denied [2025] FCR 58 - Appeal

    Username: Dartanboy I am representing a client Who is your Client?: MrFluffy2U94 File(s) attached What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] FCR 58 Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Dismissed - MrFluffy2U94 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 58 Basis for Appeal: New Evidence & Unfair...
  12. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MrFluffy2U94 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 58

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS ON LACK OF CLAIM Your honor, we are alleging a Constitutional Violation. The Defense makes strange arguments, which will be addressed: "[The Plaintiff] provides no evidence that professional qualification...
  13. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    Your honor, Justice Compass will no longer be representing Vanguard as their retainer has expired. I believe they still want to continue this case. I hope you will allow Vanguard time to find new counsel.
  14. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session Privacy Matters (Class Action Group) v. Vanguard Securities LLC [2025] FCR 36

    Your honor, Justice Compass will no longer be representing Vanguard as their retainer has expired.
  15. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MrFluffy2U94 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 58

    Your honor, this might be the longest Motion to Dismiss I've ever seen. May we have a 24 hour extension? Edit: It is also a weekday and this deadline is just half an hour after I get off work. Please allow me to work on this on Saturday.
  16. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MrFluffy2U94 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 58

    Your honor, may we respond to the motion to dismiss?
  17. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    CALLS FOR CONCLUSION These questions ask the witness for their opinion on whether something constituted an "emergency"
  18. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE Unless I missed something, there is no evidence DonTrillions reported Vanguard for anything.
  19. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    CALLS FOR CONCLUSION These questions ask for opinions (e.g. whether something was a "positive" or good thing).
  20. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vanguard & Co v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49

    FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE As the Commonwealth did not have a warrant, if the Secretary has knowledge of this he searched without a warrant.
Back
Top