Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01) Anniversary Kangaroo Court [2021] FCR 41

    I accept all of the points of your motion to dismiss, however, because I feel like it, this motion has been dismissed. I would now demand that xEndeavour or their representation provides a substantive response to this preposterous allegation.
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01) Anniversary Kangaroo Court [2021] FCR 41

    I will begin fining people who are not involved in this case but feel the need to post. Let's keep this related to the content at hand now.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Icypenguin79 v. The Department of Construction and Transport [2021] FCR 44

    I am aware a deal has been struck. Can the Secretary please inform the court and place on the record what this deal was.
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01) Anniversary Kangaroo Court [2021] FCR 41

    Sorry Bro this is my courtroom who gave you an invite? I find it contemptable that xEndeavore can reply to this but not reply in any substantive way to the issues before this court. I would kindly ask him and his representation to hurry tf up. At this rate, the server will not need to be...
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen22 v. Topte [2021] DCR 8

    Evidence in past lawsuits cannot be used in current matters where the two are not linked or have any bearing on one another. It is clear to me that spouting such a venomous personal attack against not a player, but the person behind the player, should be considered to be damage for the purpose...
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01) Anniversary Kangaroo Court [2021] FCR 41

    I am not bound by that precedent. The individual who requested the 60 hour extension is clearly a ridiculously poor lawyer, and basically a jester. Further, the judge who presided over the case also lacked any sense of understanding when it came to simple extension requests, as can be seen here...
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen22 v. Topte [2021] DCR 8

    Could the plaintiff plesse provide evidence pertaining to: - Any damage caused by the comments - Further context of the message sent by the defendant Thank you.
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01) Anniversary Kangaroo Court [2021] FCR 41

    I would ask that all members of the public not concerned in the case hold any thoughts until the defendant has replied to the summons.
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01) Anniversary Kangaroo Court [2021] FCR 41

    I'd kindly ask Crazy_Cyro_810 to chile otherwise they'll be in contempt of court and I won't hesitate to yeet them from the server. I am seriously considering jailing you for crimes against humanity for even contemplating wearing crocs. I was almost convinced by your escalator escapade...
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Concerned Citizens v. xEndeavore (Case No. 04-2021-11-01) Anniversary Kangaroo Court [2021] FCR 41

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUMMONS As I am bound by precedent, the name xEndeavore must be used from now on. Failure to use this name will result in contempt of court. The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Concerned Citizens v xEndeavore. Failure...
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned byeSprite v. SonalDonal [2021] DCR 7

    I thank the plaintiff for his patience throughout all of this. Due to the defendants actions, you have suffered a loss that must be duly compensated. As such, I order the defendant to pay: - $350 to the plaintiff for loss of revenue. Should the defendant not pay, or have enough to pay, I...
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen22 v. Topte [2021] DCR 8

    You may want to look at this thread: Information - Creating a Lawsuit | DemocracyCraft or alternatively, this thread: Redmont Bar Association | DemocracyCraft. The RBA's discord can be accessed in the server discord's #links channel. This should help you when making a proper submission - if...
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Maxterpiece v. Czar_Chief [2021] FCR 36

    As the defendant has not responded to my summons, I shall proceed with a default judgment. For a valid contract to be in existence, there must be four components present. Firstly, there must be an offer. Here, there has been an offer of accommodation made. Secondly, there must be an acceptance...
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. SonalDonal [2021] FCR 35

    As the defendant has not responded to my summons, I will proceed with a default judgment. I find the defendant guilty on all counts and as such, sentence them to: - 15 minutes imprisonment (if they have already served longer than this, please let the court know ASAP). - A fine of $1000 Thank...
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned byeSprite v. SonalDonal [2021] DCR 7

    Due to the defendant not responding to my summons, I will proceed with a default judgment. Before I do so, could the plaintiff very briefly explain how they reached the sum of $350 for damages please? Thank you.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen22 v. Topte [2021] DCR 8

    I'm afraid you're going to have to elaborate. You have 48 hours to submit a proper submission, unless an extension is needed.
  17. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Aladeen22 v. Topte [2021] DCR 8

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Aladeen22 v Topte. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff. I would recommend both parties to...
  18. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ShinHeYing v. ValioR_1299 [2021] FCR 34

    It is important that the court only focuses on the facts in issue in this case, slander regarding the first message in evidence claiming the plaintiff is a scammer. No other messages adduced in the initial complaint are of a slanderous nature. For slander to be satisfied, on a balance of...
  19. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Maxterpiece v. Czar_Chief [2021] FCR 36

    IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUMMONS The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of Maxterpiece v Czar_Chief. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.
  20. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ShinHeYing v. ValioR_1299 [2021] FCR 34

    To confirm, the defendant now has an opportunity to make a closing statement if they wish. If you do not wish to do so, please make the court aware.
Back
Top