Search results

  1. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Your Honor, It appears that Plaintiff’s counsel has, at best, been misled and, at worst, deliberately misinformed by opposing counsel regarding the existence of a so-called “five-question rule.” After careful review of the Court’s Rules and Procedures, as well as all related legal guides and...
  2. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, The Plaintiff respectfully submits that the question, “Could you describe to the court your experience during your time in Revcatraz?” is neither unclear nor imprecise. It is a straightforward, open-ended question inviting the witness to share their personal...
  3. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, The Plaintiff respectfully submits that this objection lacks merit. The question in dispute does not call for a legal opinion, but rather asks whether the witness received an explanation from the government regarding the clear discrepancy between their...
  4. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, The Plaintiff respectfully disagrees with the Defense’s objection. The question posed does not improperly seek speculation or a legal conclusion, but rather invites the witness to speak to standard administrative procedure or established practice within the...
  5. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, The Plaintiff respectfully submits the following response to the Defense’s objection regarding the formulation of the submitted questions: First, the suggestion that the questions contain “multiple inquiries” misunderstands their structure and intent. These...
  6. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your honor, Apologies to the Court and opposing counsel. Coming from a real-world legal background, Plaintiff’s counsel did not anticipate that questioning would be limited. We appreciate the clarification and have amended the question list accordingly to align with...
  7. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    @DocsTheory Good evening, I’m Patototongo1, you already know me, I am your council. I’ll be asking you a few questions regarding the events relevant to your case in the hopes of bringing light and justice to the situation. For the sake of efficiency, I’ll be presenting all of my questions in a...
  8. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    @End For the sake of efficiency, I’ll be presenting all of my questions in a single block below: Are you familiar with the procedures used to jail and unjail players on the server? Does the Staff Team utilize any plugins or automated tools to administer jail sentences? To your knowledge, are...
  9. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    @End Good morning, I’m Patototongo1, counsel for the Plaintiff. I’ll be asking you a few questions regarding the events and procedures relevant to this case. First of all, Can you confirm your role within the Staff Team at the time of the events in question?
  10. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Your Honor, Counsel for the Plaintiff respectfully requests a 24 hour extension to the current questioning period. Due to unforeseen personal circumstances, I will be away from my computer and unable to participate for the entorety of the day. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully...
  11. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    Your Honor, Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Court Rules and Procedure, the Plaintiff formally requests that the trial in the above-captioned matter be held in-game. As permitted by the rules, either party may request an in-game trial, provided both sides consent. The Plaintiff is willing to...
  12. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND Your honor, The Plaintiff respectfully moves to amend the witness list, appending the following individual: Intercepticon — Former Head of the Department of Homeland Security and the government official who handled the...
  13. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your honor, The Defense failed to submit their opening statement within the timeframe set by the Court and did not request an extension or exemption prior to the deadline. While the delay may appear minor...
  14. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, This case concerns the unlawful deprivation of liberty and the failure of the Commonwealth to remedy an acknowledged injustice. The Plaintiff, DocTheory, was sentenced on December 22, 2024, to nearly seven days...
  15. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: In Session DocTheory v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 42

    May it please the Court, The Plaintiff, DocTheory, will now be represented by Mezimoři Law due to the aforementioned conflict of interest encountered by prior counsel at Dragon Law. I, Patototongo1, will be serving as primary counsel on behalf of Mezimoři Law. The new counsel intends to fully...
  16. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: Adjourned fluffywaafelz v. undatheradar [2025] FCR 54

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION OF NOLLE PROSEQUI Your honor, The Plaintiff and the Defendant have reached a mutual settlement in regard to the matter before the Court. In light of this settlement’s acceptance by both parties, the Plaintiff considers this matter...
  17. Patototongo1

    Accepted Patototongo1 - Grant Application

    The 50k was utilized to buy S107 for the same price, a 1344sq block (48 x 28) S plot, this will be the future home of Athena Tower (built by personal investment), this building will serve as the HQ of Aegis Athena.
  18. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: Adjourned fluffywaafelz v. undatheradar [2025] FCR 54

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT REQUESTS FOR DISCOVERY Under Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), “[p]rior to the end of Discovery, a party may move to request documents, messages, or screenshots from the opposing party.” Reserving the right to make...
  19. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: Adjourned fluffywaafelz v. undatheradar [2025] FCR 54

    Your Honor, The Plaintiff respectfully requests clarification as to whether the Defendant’s use of the term “dispute” in their Answer to Complaint is intended to carry the same meaning as “deny” under Rule 3.2 of the Court Rules and Procedures. Respectfully submitted, Patototongo1
  20. Patototongo1

    Lawsuit: Adjourned fluffywaafelz v. undatheradar [2025] FCR 54

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, The Plaintiff formally objects to the Defendant’s latest statement, “Your Honor, I will be representing myself,” on the following grounds: 1. Violation of a Prior Judicial Order This statement...
Back
Top