Search results

  1. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nebrasken64 [2025] FCR 23

    My apologies, this is the deadline to enter their plea.
  2. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nebrasken64 [2025] FCR 23

    The Defense has 72 hours to file an Answer to Complaint
  3. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Krisztie v. zko0 [2025] FCR 13

    The Defense has not provided an Opening Statement. I hereby charge the Public Defender Program with Contempt of Court. I order a $2500 fine. I will still allow an Opening Statement to be filed within the next 24 hours.
  4. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nebrasken64 [2025] FCR 23

    I hereby find Nebrasken64 in Contempt of Court for failing to appear. The sentencing will be announced later. I am also appointing a Public Defender, as this is a criminal case.
  5. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Discovery will now begin. It will last 72 hours unless otherwise modified.
  6. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    Overruled. On Lack of Claim, this motion alleges insufficient evidence for damages, which could still be shown in Discovery. Furthermore, regardless of whether the Plaintiff has yet demonstrated a legal basis for his claims, his filing may be amended during Discovery, and also Opening...
  7. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v.Tonga1 [2025] FCR 24

    The Defense has 72 hours to file an Answer to Complaint
  8. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v.Tonga1 [2025] FCR 24

    @Tonga1 is required to appear before the Federal Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in the case of Vernicia v. Tonga1.
  9. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nebrasken64 [2025] FCR 23

    Nebrasken64 is hereby summoned to the Federal Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in the case of The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nebrasken64 [2025] FCR 23.
  10. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    The Defense has 72 hours to file an Answer to Complaint.
  11. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Krisztie v. zko0 [2025] FCR 13

    The Defense has 72 hours to provide their Opening Statement
  12. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned lcn v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 18

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT lcn v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 18 I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION 1. Blazora Corporation (formerly Easy Corporation) entered a contract with the Plaintiff by offering a bond on the Exchange and the Plaintiff purchasing 931 shares of it...
  13. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: In Session RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

    The Attorney General @Freeze_Line or another person who is legally qualified to represent the Commonwealth is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21.
  14. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned xEndeavour v. Unitymaster [2025] FCR 25

    Due to having a conversation about this in #legal with the Plaintiff, I will be voluntarily recusing.
  15. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned lcn v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 18

    Could the Plaintiff please explain to me how the value of the bond was inflated? Please answer within 48 hours.
  16. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Bank of Reveille v. Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) [2025] FCR 22

    I am voluntarily recusing from the case as I was involved in the DoJ's investigation in this case when I was Solicitor General.
  17. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Krisztie v. zko0 [2025] FCR 13

    Discovery is well beyond over. The Plaintiff has 72 hours to file an Opening Statement.
  18. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Krisztie v. zko0 [2025] FCR 13

    I apologize for the delay. I've been sick IRL.
  19. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Adjourned lcn v. Blazora Corporation [2025] FCR 18

    I apologize for the delay. I've been sick IRL.
  20. Dartanboy

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnityMaster v. xEndeavour [2025] FCR 16

    The Motion to Dismiss is sustained, based on Lack of Claim. The Plaintiff provided no evidence supporting their claims that the statements made were false. Since the burden of proof falls on the Plaintiff, there is no way for the Plaintiff to prove, even in a balance of probabilities, that the...
Back
Top