Search results

FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE This information, if it exists, is protected by Attorney-Client Privilege. Requiring it to be provided would be Fruit of the Poisonous Tree.

MOTION TO RECONSIDER As previously mentioned, we were able to get the data for an individual person but not everyone at once. To do so would require us to reprogram the technology. We  cannot provide this info. I don't know what you want us to do.

For RylandW: 1. What actual, provable damages have you suffered as a result of v__d's alleged defamation? 2. Do you have any evidence of these damages (if any)? 3. Do you have any evidence that v__d's alleged defamation is the cause of these damages (if any)?

Introduction Your honor, I have no doubt the Commonwealth will provide lengthy arguments attempting to show how, through some misinterpretation of the Taxation Act, this seizure was somehow justified, but in reality this case is simple: The Commonwealth has frozen a business and seized millions...

My apologies for not adding these sooner. It is my mistake. But as the court ordered them to be entered, I must enter them:

May I have a 12 hour extension due to IRL circumstances? I basically only have time to speedrun all my DC/SC obligations on Thursday until next week.

May we have an 36 hour extension due to IRL circumstances

MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honor, the witness is literally trstifying about other people's beliefs. One cannot simply say "I believe that other people believe X" as that is simply testifying about other people's beliefs under the guise of being one's own. In a more extreme case, one could...

The Plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint, adding: Fact 11. The Commonwealth finally provided evidence (although the Plaintiff finds it incomplete and noncompelling) however they have done so long after the seizure and only after it was contested in court (see D-006).

The Defense seeks to submit the balances of all users of Discover Bank and Vanguard National Bank, but recognizes this information is protected by the Privacy Act. We seek Closed Court to submit it.

The Defense submits Exhibit P-010:

INTERROGATORY 4. What steps did the Commonwealth take to attempt to resolve the alleged issue through a course of action other than seizure of Vanguard's banks?

RELEVANCE supersuperking is neither a DoC employee (based on the DC Discord) nor an employee of Vanguard. We don't see the witness' relevance.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honor, clearly this case is not a big deal to the Commonwealth, or they wouldn't be on day 4 out of 2 to respond to 3 questions. Furthermore, the Court rules are clear, stating that answers  must be given in time...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT The Court Rules clearly dictate: (Rule 4.8) and (Rule 5.13) The equivalent to a Dismissal on the Plaintiff's side is a Default Judgement. As it has been More than 80 hours since interrogatories were asked, it is...

INTERROGATORY The following interrogatory is submitted for the Commonwealth to respond to: 1. What evidence did the Commonwealth have that there was a financial crisis or other major problem that necessitated the seizure of Vanguard's banks? 2. Why didn't the Commonwealth serve Vanguard a...

Speculation Witness is testifying about other people's thoughts

BREACH OF PROCEDURE After Closing Statements is no time for an Amicus Brief,  further delaying the trial of my client.

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT Naezaratheus has been permanently deported. We request Default Judgement.

Narrative | Nothing Pending The witness has elaborated much further than the question asked about.