Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT May it please the Court, Your Honor, opposing counsel, citizens of Redmont, the claims made by the Plaintiff are incorrect and today we will go over why this is the case. On the first claim for relief The plaintiff claims...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT RealImza Plaintiff v. adonimous_blueYT (Formerly StaleUmbrella80) Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defence DENIES that the Defendant committed attempted murder and murder against the plaintiff on the 16th and...

Your Honor, I will be representing the Defendant in this case as a Public Defender.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, as the Defendant explained in-depth in their Opening Statement, the Plaintiff simply has not brought forward any evidence for the wild claims that they are making in this case. Their closing statement does not...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION winterwolf (represented by Dragon Law) Plaintiff v. The Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On the 8th of February 2025 winterwolf declared that they would be...

Your Honor, the Plaintiff's first question " Can you confirm your tenancy on the willow plot wl-f086 on January 19th, 2025?" was answered by the witness with "Yes i can". The statement that the witness previously confirmed their tenancy on plot wl-f086 on January 19th 2025 is therefore correct.

3. You previously confirmed your tenancy on plot wl-f086 on January 19th 2025, who were you renting this plot from at that date?

I hope this is sufficient. If the court was instead looking for different credentials, could the court please clarify what credentials they intended to be displayed?

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - NON-RESPONSIVE This does not answer the question that was asked. The personal relationship between the witness and MrCheesGuy was already asked and answered in the defense's second question. The defense's third question asked...

3. If MrCheesGuy was the one who was renting the plot, what tenancy on the plot did you intend to confirm when answering the Plaintiff's first question?

Good evening, Mr. MeneerLolo. The defense has two questions for you: 1. To clarify, were you the one renting plot wl-f086 on January 19th, 2025? 2. What is your relationship with MrCheesGuy?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Good afternoon, Your Honor, opposing counsel, citizens of Redmont. May it please the Court, As the Defendant’s Opening Statement is quite unclear on what it is trying to say, much of the work in figuring out what the...

Your Honor, The Plaintiffs respectfully request a 12 hour extension to post their Closing Statement.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT May it please the Court, Your Honor, opposing counsel, citizens of Redmont, this case is an example of the Executive branch failing to follow legislation and harming the very citizens it is meant to serve. The facts of this...

Your Honor, The Plaintiffs request a 24 hour extension to post their Opening Statement due to unforeseen circumstances.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, the Plaintiff’s opening statement was full of claims of alleged misdeeds that the Defendant has allegedly committed. But how many of these alleged misdeeds have any evidence supporting them? The Plaintiff first...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: Rule 5.7 (Failure to Include Party) of our Court Rules and Procedures states that a Motion to Dismiss can be filed...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PLEA The People of the Commonwealth of Redmont through The Department of Justice Prosecution v. Nebrasken64 Defendant I. ENTRY OF PLEA 1. Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY to the two counts of treason. 2. Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY to the two...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE The Prosecution’s case filing does not include agreement to understanding the penalties of lying in the court and the fact that they are subject to perjury should they knowingly make a false statement in court...

RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, the Defendant has filed a Motion to Reconsider the court's decision to move for a Summary Judgment, however the Defendant has not brought forward any valid reasoning to do so. The Plaintiffs respectfully request the court to overrule this Motion...