Search results

Discovery has now ended, Plaintiff has 72 Hours to submit their Opening Statement.

The Motion to Dismiss here hereby ACCEPTED. The Court thanks everyone involved.

In Game Trial set for Saturday, June 15th 2024 at 6PM EST. The Venue will be the Federal Court House in game.

@antilethal is hereby held in Contempt, court is in recess pending verdict.

We will now be moving into a 7 Day Discovery period. Should both sides agree, discovery can be ended early.

Excellent i hereby reverse the Contempt Charge.

@Louder_Leo is hereby held in Contempt of Court, I order the Department of Homeland Security to fine/jail accordingly. I will allow and additional 24 Hours for them to appear before this court.

They both are owners and they both need to consent to being represented by the same counsel.

With both side not in agreement, the discovery deadline is still in effect.

Does the Defense agree?

Motion to Dismiss is hereby denied, discovery can shed light on these claims. Before we move forward, the court will wait for Louder_Leo to appear or his attorney, failure to do so and failure for both partys to agree to the same attorney will force me to break up the case.

The Court request that next time you use Proper Formatting and File the Answer to Complaint and Motion to Dismiss in separate post, keeps the threat cleaner and easier to reference in the future. The Plaintiff will now have 48 Hours to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. @Louder_Leo Still has...

The plaintiff has 48 hours to respond.

We will move this to a sidebar in the judiciary discord to set up a time.

Case dismissed a the Request of the Plaintiff.

Do you wish to have an in game trial, if so, does this time and date work for you?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Steveshat v. supersuperking[2024] FCR 63 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. Steveshat won $1,800,000 from a game of Roulette in the Keystone Holdings Casino, 2. Keystone Holdings refused to pay the full 1.8 Million because they claimed the max...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Steveshat v. HenryDz5 [2024] FCR 65 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. Steveshat won $1,800,000 from a game of Roulette in the Keystone Holdings Casino, 2. Keystone Holdings refused to pay the full 1.8 Million because they claimed the max bet...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Steveshat v. Vanguard [2024] FCR 62 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. Steveshat won $1,800,000 from a game of Roulette in the Keystone Holdings Casino, 2. Keystone Holdings refused to pay the full 1.8 Million because they claimed the max bet...

Defense has 72 Hours to give their opening statement