Search results

  1. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    Thank you for your statement. Regarding the request to submit additional evidence outside of discovery regarding presidential/ secretarial negligence, which could affect the severity of punitive damages if the court were to rule in favour of the plaintiff, the court will grant a 12 hour window...
  2. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Ko531 [2025] FCR 3

    Overruled. As the Defense has pointed out, inflammatory objections are normally reserved for witness statements. In this case, the use of this language is to highlight their argument. They serve to enhance the agreeability of their argument.
  3. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    Thank you for the timely post. The prosecution now has 48 hours to post their opening statement. Please request a time extension if necessary.
  4. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Ko531 [2025] FCR 3

    With that, discovery is set for a maximum of 72 hours. Both parties may agree to end it early.
  5. Dr_Eksplosive

    Expungement: Granted Freeze_Line - Expungement Request

    does the Commonwealth concur?
  6. Dr_Eksplosive

    Expungement: Granted lcn - Expungement Request

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT Lcn - Expungement Request The recommendation of the state supports this expungement, therefore I will be granting this expungement. I hereby order the Department of Homeland Security to remove the charges listed.
  7. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RoryyyMC v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 129

    Noting the absence of the Honourable Judge Jakovus, court is hereby in recess , pending verdict, in accordance with the motion for summary judgment. Thank you to both parties for continuing to meet deadlines without prompt from the presiding officer.
  8. Dr_Eksplosive

    Expungement: Granted lcn - Expungement Request

    @Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of lcn- Expungement Request Please declare whether you approve or disprove of this expungement request upon arrival.
  9. Dr_Eksplosive

    Expungement: Granted Freeze_Line - Expungement Request

    @Mask3D_WOLF is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Freeze_Line - Expungment Request Please state whether you approve or deny this expungement request.
  10. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Ko531 [2025] FCR 3

    @ko531 is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Commonwelath of Redmont v. ko531.
  11. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    The Court recognises the failure on the plaintiff’s behalf. The timer for an answer to complaint/motion to dismiss is halted for 12 hours. The Plaintiff is to respond to the interrogatory posed by the Defense, or be held in contempt.
  12. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    Apologies, I misread the case filing. The Defense has 48 hours from this post to file an answer to complaint. apologies for the inconvenience, i am working from mobile.
  13. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    The time allotted for discovery has now elapsed. The Defense now has 48 hours to enter a plea.
  14. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    Sustained. While the question makes it clear that 1.2 million was a value obtained from a speculative bid.,The question asks the value the government gives the property, which as the defense has pointed out, cannot be assigned without a finalised public transaction. Prosecution may either...
  15. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] DCR 1

    Motion to recuse is denied. The defense has failed to provide any evidence relating to direct bias against them by the magistrate in question. While perception/appearance of bias is a valid reason, I will be ruling against as it sets poor precedent regarding that any party of a case can sue the...
  16. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    Thank you. Discovery is set to end 72 hours from this message, or whenever both parties to agree to end it early.
  17. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF MANDAMUS Upon review of the merits of the case, the Court has determined to accept the emergency injunction. The properties of c068,c069,c070 & c071, more commonly known as 'Abbotts' are to be frozen. These properties may not be...
  18. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MrEntomology v. bigpappa140

    Granted. Case dismissed with prejudice.
  19. Dr_Eksplosive

    Happy birthday vern!

    Happy birthday vern!
  20. Dr_Eksplosive

    Appeal: Accepted [2024] FCR 124 - Appeal

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT 2-0 Decision the Supreme Court has decided to Accept this appeal. The Supreme Court hereby overrules Judge Jakovus’ sentencing guidelines. No criminal forfeits any rights whatsoever, regardless if they are a repeat offender or not. However...
Back
Top