Search results

Your Honor, does the original timeline for Discovery still apply?

BREACH OF PROCEDURE Per Rule 4.8, Plaintiff and Defendant may ask up to 5 relevant questions while within discovery to each other... The Defendant has asked his five questions. He can't ask anymore.

2. Issues with Discord relating to firing people at the time. 3. My client no longer has access to DCT. Any answer would be speculation.

Non-Responsive End didn't answer the question, again. I asked if p-003 was the form used to submit articles to Politico, not if it was anonymous.

4. There was no one to fire. I'm reaching out to my client regarding Questions 2 and 3. Your Honor, in order to ensure we have the full picture (and due to pressing IRL matters), I'd like to request a 24 hour extension to respond to the remainder of the defendant's interrogatories.

Submitting p-003 into evidence. INTERROGATORY: 2. Can you confirm that p-003 is the anonymous submission form used by Politico?

INTERROGATORY: 1. Who is the author of the article showcased in p-002? Further questions may follow depending on defendant's response.

Your Honor, I'll be submitting p-001 and p-002 into evidence. Also attached is proof of representation.

I move to submit p-004, p-005, p-006, p-007, and p-008 into evidence. Furthermore Your Honor, I wish to amend the Complaint to remove the Breach of Contract from the Claims for Relief/Prayer for Relief.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE, PERJURY Your Honor, everything written below the linked court case is irrelevant. It is neither evidence nor an interrogatory, and I move that it be struck. More pressingly however, Your Honor, there is a...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE This has absolutely nothing to do with the case at hand, and appears to be nothing more than an attempt to smear the plaintiff. I Motion to Strike the question.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUME FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE Your Honor, the defendant has not provided evidence to conclusively show that "no one" was aware of Unity's role as Secretary. In addition, evidence has not established that anyone has been fired...

Your Honors, I'd like to file an Amicus Brief.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION .Lucky_waq Plaintiff (Represented by AmityBlamity) v. YourChillGamer Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On February 8th, 2025, around 22:40 CET, my client was attempting to sell a...

Response to Objection: The burden of proof is on Defendant's counsel here. Defendant's counsel claimed that Defendant felt "remorse and understands what he has done" yet has offered neither Evidence nor Witness to justify these claims. I countered this argument in my Closing Statement with...

Response to Objection: Your Honor, this appears to be nothing more than an attempt to waste the court's time. Defendant's counsel agreed to end Discovery early. If they had an issue with the evidence I submitted, why didn't they raise an objection during Discovery?

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT It is disgraceful for the Defendant's counsel to claim that the Defendant clearly stated he feels remorse and understands what he has done. P-015 shows someone who isn't genuinely apologetic for their actions, but instead someone who demands...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT May it please the Court, Your honor, opposing counsel, and others following this case, each and every one of us is bound by the law. It exists to guide the citizens of this great nation, to protect those dealt grave injustices, and to punish...

Your Honor, both the Defense and I are in agreement on ending Discovery early.

Your Honor, I wish to submit the following images into evidence: p-014 and p-015.