Search results

The Defense would like to amend their Answer to Complaint as follows due to the information provided in D-011 and D-012 (edits in yellow) 7. DENIES that in total, DocTheory served 5 days, 18 minutes, and 24 seconds of in-game jail time, having skipped 1 day, 2 hours, 31 minutes, and 39 seconds...

The Defense enters the following pieces of evidence.

Your Honor, the Defense requests a further 24 hour extension of Discovery so that they can take actions based on the evidence that has now been provided by the Plaintiff.

Your Honor, the Defense respectfully requests 24 more hours to answer the Interrogatories asked by the Plaintiff and apologizes for the delay in doing so.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT REQUESTS FOR DISCOVERY The Defense hereby requests a screenshot of the message "90 hours left" from DocTheory as shown in P-005 that shows the date and time on which this message was sent.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY The Defense hereby requests the following from each Plaintiff: A list of all of the Plaintiff's assets that they allege were seized by the Commonwealth (as per the Plaintiffs' first Claim for Relief).

INTERROGATORY 1. The Plaintiffs in their first Claim for Relief allege that the Commonwealth conducted an unreasonable seizure against them. Which specific assets of the Plaintiffs do they allege were seized by the Commonwealth?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, the Plaintiff’s claims and reasoning are simply incorrect. We have gone over the alleged violations of Section 15 of the CSA in our Opening Statement and as neither the witness questioning nor the Plaintiff’s...

The Defendant hereby respectfully requests an extension to Discovery in line with Rule 4.4 of the Court Rules and Procedures.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, while it is true that witness RaiTheGuy did not respond to the questions asked within the timeframe of 48 hours, the Defendant would like to remind the Court of the fact that there was a pending Objection filed...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honor, an Objection - Assumes Facts Not In Evidence is for those cases where "a question presumes something as true that has not been established by evidence." The questions to which the Plaintiff is objecting are...

@MasterAshim 2. Did you DM BigPappa140: "would you reccomend me to buy the fiflty reich mystery box? " 3. Did BigPappa140 respond to the DM mentioned in question 2 with: "Can't answer that" "Not getting attacked by the doc for a mystery box" "Lmao" 4. Did you, following the DMs referenced in...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, the Court already stated that they would rule on the motion after the 48 hours had passed. The Plaintiff bringing their motion up once again is wholly unnecessary. The Plaintiff has spoken out of...

@MasterAshim 1. When bidding on the mystery box, were you aware that the value the items inside would have to you could be less than 50k? @Bardiya_King 1. Were you a DOC employee at the time of the "Filthy Rich Mystery Box" auction? 2. Is the screenshot D-001 a screenshot from a DOC ticket...

Your Honor, the Defense is aware that the 72-hour period has already elapsed, and that they did not request an extension in time. However, considering that the Defendant has not requested any extensions previously in this case and that the deadline passed recently enough that the Court has not...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The first claim for relief made by the Plaintiff is that the Defendant caused the Plaintiff to be belittled...

The Defendant consents to ending Discovery early, would the Plaintiff wish to do so.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Ethamn Plaintiff v. Faldorix Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The defence DENIES that the Plaintiff was first murdered by the Defendant when attempting to leave spawn. 2. The defence DENIES that this was brought to...

Your Honor, I will be representing the Defendant in this case as a Public Defender.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION - PERJURY Both the Complaint and the Answer to the Complaint agree that the Defendant has at one point in time stated that mystery boxes are a form of gambling. This is what is said in Fact #5 of the Answer, which the...