Search results

Your Honor, I ask for a 24 hour extension as I have an important exam the day after tomorrow. I apologize for such a late request, and for asking for an extension a 2nd time in this case.

Your Honor, AlexanderLove has not provided any evidence that they are representing Vernicia. We ask that the court urges him to provide proof of representation.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT The Plaintiff has stated that we should ignore the dictionary definition, when they themselves were the ones who brought it up in the beginning. Redmont is to use the Oxford Dictionary for defining words as stated by the...

Apologies for the late response, the Defence has no questions for the Plaintiff's witness.

OBJECTION Calls for a conclusion This question assumes that the witness was already planning on buying the plot, and it also asks for an opinion, not a fact. Therefore, the Defense asks for the question and response from the witness to be struck. OBJECTION Ambiguous "3. Was the experience...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT 1. In regards to breach of contract, let's analyze the timeline of the auction: - Auction being enlisted (17th January, 6:20 PM UTC) - Plaintiff 1's bid (17th January, 6:22 PM UTC, 2 minutes after the auction's enlistment) -...

I apologize your honor, but I have recently been infected with malaria. I am asking for a 36 hour extension due to this. Thank you for your consideration.

The Defence wishes to request a 24 hour extension to Discovery.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE The Plaintiff has not specified what motion they are filing, therefore the Defence asks for this statement to be struck.

The Defence wishes to submit the following evidence:

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE This is not a motion nor an objection, therefore the defendant asks for this statement to be struck.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Vernicia (Represented by Dragon Law Firm) Plaintiff v. Tonga1 (Represented by zLost) Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Defence affirms Fact 1, however denies that the names ‘Vernicia’ ‘Bezzer’ were clearly visible...

Your Honor, I apologize for this but I ask for a 24 hours extension due to exams IRL.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE These statements are irrelevant, due to the fact that the Plaintiff ran as an independant and the RPP's policies are not being brought into question.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed under Rule 5.14 (Factual Error), and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The Plaintiff has stated an easily proveable false fact in their complaint...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY This statements are false, as we can see in the Plaintiff's own evidence, the campaign message received a total of 11 'fire' reactions, not 13. The Plaintiff provided this evidence themselves and even repeated this...

@Matthew100x

this is fax

Your Honor, I apologize for my intrusion but I ask that this case be handled as soon as possible, due to the upcoming general elections.

The Plaintiff concurs.