Search results

Motion to Strike granted. Motion to Amend granted.

Motion to dismiss is denied. For lack of claim, the assertion that the commonwealth did not break the law with nothing to back it besides the commonwealth's own words is not a valid reason to dismiss a case. For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, the plaintiff was clearly impacted by the...

Motion to dismiss denied The Supreme Court in the very case you quoted gave protections to organizations as they are ran by citizens and any actions against them affects citizens. As for your other points, they are defenses for the legality of the DOC's actions which is the major fact being...

You may, and just for future reference, you dont need to ask to respond to objections

We will now be entering Discovery, discovery will last 72 hours starting now.

Motion to dismiss is denied The clear second party would be the commonwealth in this case, either damages caused in the jailing itself of the negligence in facilitating his release. Even if this was caused by a glitch, it does not remove the duty of the commonwealth to release him if informed.

As both objections pertain to the mislabeling of evidence which the plaintiff has fixed, both objections are Overruled

Objection #1 Improper Evidence Sustained, please split up the collage so each component can be address individually throughout this case. Objection #2 Relevance Sustained, Please provide both sides of the conversation. Objection #3 Relevence, Overruled, Juniperfig was clearly representing the...

Objection overruled as the defendent has a right to privacy especially when such information has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

You have 24 hours to respond to the motion to dismiss

You may respond, you have 24 hours to do so

You may respond to the motion to dismiss

The Court accepts the plea agreement and this case is dismissed.

This was my bad as I forgot to lock the thread but as a Former chief justice, you should know to not speak in a case after it has been adjourned Therefore I am charging End with Contempt of court.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT End v. Commonwealth [2025] FCR 44 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The Redmont Legal Code Act establishes a process whereby the Legal Code Committee has unilateral legislative power. 2. The Act creates an alternate legislative path not...

Granted

You have 72 hours to provide your answer to complaint

You have 72 hours to provide your answer to complaint

You have 72 hours to provide your Answer to Complaint

@juniperfig is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Vangaurd Co. v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 49